Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.55640/

Bridging the Interpretability Gap: A Comprehensive Framework for Operationalizing Explainable AI, Trust, and Corporate Digital Responsibility in Algorithmic Decision-Making

Dr. Elias Thorne , Department of Data Science and Information Systems
Dr. Sarah J. Bennett , Institute of Advanced Technology

Abstract

Background: As Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems increasingly mediate critical decisions in healthcare, finance, and governance, the "black box" nature of complex algorithms poses significant ethical and operational risks. The opacity of deep learning models creates a trust deficit that hinders adoption and obscures algorithmic bias.

Methods: This study employs a systematic conceptual synthesis to integrate technical Explainable AI (XAI) methodologies with the broader organizational mandate of Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR). We analyze current XAI taxonomies, bias mitigation strategies, and trust maturity models to propose a unified "Trust-Explainability-Responsibility" (TER) framework.

Results: Our analysis demonstrates that technical explainability alone is insufficient for establishing trust. The TER framework establishes that transparency must be tiered according to stakeholder needs—providing local interpretability for end-users and global interpretability for auditors. Furthermore, we identify that integrating blockchain-based dynamic consent mechanisms significantly enhances data provenance and perceived fairness.

Conclusion: We conclude that operationalizing responsible AI requires a shift from purely accuracy-driven metrics to a holistic evaluation of model behavior. The proposed framework offers a roadmap for organizations to align algorithmic performance with ethical norms, ensuring that AI systems remain transparent, fair, and accountable.

Keywords

Explainable AI (XAI), Corporate Digital Responsibility, Algorithmic Bias, Machine Learning Transparency

References

Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black-box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE access, 6, 52138-52160.

Ahmad, M. A., Eckert, C., & Teredesai, A. (2018, August). Interpretable machine learning in healthcare. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM international conference on bioinformatics, computational biology, and health informatics (pp. 559-560).

Aruldoss, M., Lakshmi Travis, M., & Prasanna Venkatesan, V. (2014). A survey on recent research in business intelligence. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(6), 831-866.

Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., ... & Herrera, F. (2020). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information fusion, 58, 82-115.

Allen, G. I., Gan, L., & Zheng, L. (2023). Interpretable machine learning for discovery: Statistical challenges and opportunities. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 11.

Azodi, C. B., Tang, J., & Shiu, S. H. (2020). Opening the black box: interpretable machine learning for geneticists. Trends in genetics, 36(6), 442-455.

Balasubramaniam, N., Kauppinen, M., Rannisto, A., Hiekkanen, K., & Kujala, S. (2023). Transparency and explainability of AI systems: From ethical guidelines to requirements. Information and Software Technology, 159, 107197.

Liao, Q.V., Gruen, D. and Miller, S., 2020, April. Questioning the AI: informing design practices for explainable AI user experiences. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-15).

Lobschat, L., Mueller, B., Eggers, F., Brandimarte, L., Diefenbach, S., Kroschke, M. and Wirtz, J., 2021. Corporate digital responsibility. Journal of Business Research, 122, pp.875-888.

Mamo, N., Martin, G.M., Desira, M., Ellul, B. and Ebejer, J.P., 2020. Dwarna: a blockchain solution for dynamic consent in biobanking. European Journal of Human Genetics, 28(5), pp.609-626.

Manure, A. and Bengani, S., 2023. Bias and Fairness. In Introduction to Responsible AI: Implement Ethical AI Using Python (pp. 23-60). Berkeley, CA: Apress.

Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K. and Galstyan, A., 2021. A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 54(6), pp.1-35.

Mylrea, M. and Robinson, N., 2023. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Trust Framework and Maturity Model: Applying an Entropy Lens to Improve Security, Privacy, and Ethical AI. Entropy, 25(10), p.1429.

Nassar, A. and Kamal, M., 2021. Ethical Dilemmas in AI-Powered Decision-Making: A Deep Dive into Big DataDriven Ethical Considerations. International Journal of Responsible Artificial Intelligence, 11(8), pp.1-11.

Radu, R., 2021. Steering the governance of artificial intelligence: national strategies in perspective. Policy and society, 40(2), pp.178-193.

Yashika Vipulbhai Shankheshwaria, & Dip Bharatbhai Patel. (2025). Explainable AI in Machine Learning: Building Transparent Models for Business Applications. Frontiers in Emerging Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 2(08), 08–15.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Dr. Elias Thorne, & Dr. Sarah J. Bennett. (2025). Bridging the Interpretability Gap: A Comprehensive Framework for Operationalizing Explainable AI, Trust, and Corporate Digital Responsibility in Algorithmic Decision-Making. International Journal of Data Science and Machine Learning, 5(02), 290-297. https://doi.org/10.55640/