The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in government creates substantial opportunities for automated decision-making, threat detection, public-service optimization, and strategic security operations, but it simultaneously introduces risks involving privacy, model reliability, explain ability, cybersecurity, and national security. This research develops an integrated policy framework for secure and responsible government AI by synthesizing the methodological and conceptual lessons contained in the provided literature on machine learning, deep learning, risk prediction, intelligent decision support, and healthcare AI. The methodology adopts a policy-oriented synthesis approach and translates principles of predictive modeling, feature selection, hybrid inference, deep learning, and explain ability into a governmental AI governance architecture. Particular attention is given to the relationship between predictive performance and responsible deployment, emphasizing that technically accurate models may remain unsuitable for public-sector use when their decisions cannot be explained, audited, or governed. The proposed framework integrates six dimensions: cybersecurity protection, privacy preservation, explainable AI, risk-based governance, human oversight, and national-security accountability. The findings indicate that responsible government AI requires a layered rather than purely technical approach in which model development, data governance, deployment security, continuous monitoring, and institutional accountability operate as interconnected controls. The framework also identifies a critical research gap: existing AI studies demonstrate the technical value of intelligent prediction but provide limited direct guidance for reconciling AI-enabled governmental security with privacy and democratic accountability. The study concludes that secure government AI should be governed as a socio-technical infrastructure rather than treated merely as a predictive software capability.

Artificial Intelligence, Government AI, Cybersecurity, Privacy Protection

M. Abdar et al., "A New Machine Learning Technique for an Accurate Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease," Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 179, 2019.

Volker Adams, and Josef Niebauer, “Reversing Heart Failure–Associated Pathophysiology with Exercise: What Actually Improves and by How Much?,” Heart Failure Clinics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2015.

B. Akay, "Support Vector Machines Combined with Feature Selection for Breast Cancer Diagnosis," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 3240–3247, 2009.

Hussain Ahmad, “A Hybrid Deep Learning Technique for Personality Trait Classification from Text,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 146214-146232, 2021.

Andre Esteva et al., “A Guide to Deep Learning in Healthcare,” Nature Medicine, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 2019.

Fei Jianget al., “Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Past, Present and Future,” Stroke and Vascular Neurology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 230–243, 2017.

S. Khatibi and G. A. Montazer, "A fuzzy-Evidential Hybrid Inference Engine for Coronary Heart Disease Risk Assessment," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 8536–8542, 2010.

Kalie Y. Kebed et al. “Importance of the Left Atrium: More Than a Bystander?,” Heart Failure Clinics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 193–204, 2019.

Y. Kumar, G. K. Kaur, and R. Singh, "Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning Applications in Heart Disease Prediction," International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 2805-2812, 2024.

Mukesh Kumar Saini, “Machine Learning Techniques for Precise Heart Disease Prediction,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 12, no. 12, 2120-2129, 2024.

R. Narain, S. Saxena, A.K. and Goyal, “Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: A Comparative Study of Framingham and Quantum Neural Network Based Approach,” Patient Preference and Adherence, vol. 10, 1259–1270, 2016.

R. Deepa et al., " Early Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease Using Machine Learning: Unveiling Risk Factors from Health Records," AIP Advances, vol. 14, no. 3, 2024.

Jack Rubinstein, and Darek Sanford, “Treatment of Cardiorenal Syndrome,” Cardiology Clinics, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 317-329, 2019.

Sang C Suh, Anusha Upadhyaya B.N, and Ashwin Nadig N.V, “Analyzing Personality Traits and External Factors for Stem Education Awareness using Machine Learning,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1-6, 2019.

Devansh Shah, “Heart Disease Prediction using Machine Learning Techniques,” SN Computer Science, vol. 1, pp. 345–352, 2020.

S.R. Steinhubl et al., “The Emerging Role of Mobile Health in Cardiovascular Care,” JAMA Cardiology, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 943–944, 2016.

M. G. Tsirigos et al., “Machine Learning for Cardiovascular Disease Prediction: A Review,” Current Atherosclerosis Reports, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1–10, 2020.

World Health Organization, Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs), 2021. Online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds)

World Heart Federation, World Heart Report 2023, pp. 1-52, 2023. Online: https://world-heart-federation.org/wp-content/uploads/World-Heart-Report-2023.pdf

Ahmed, F. (2024). Cybersecurity policy frameworks for AI in government: Balancing national security and privacy concerns. Int. J. Multidiscip. Sci. Manag, 1(4), 43-53.

K. Ramamurthy, R. K. Konduru and N. Amanmadov, "Evo Graph Coder: An Evolutionary Graph-Reasoning Framework for Self-Adaptive Software Engineering," in IEEE Access, vol. 14, pp. 63063-63076, 2026, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3686019.

Philip, P. G. (2024). Artificial Intelligence-Driven Project Risk Prediction Models: Enhancing Decision-Making Accuracy in Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects. American Journal of Technology, 3(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.58425/ajt.v3i1.571.