This comparative analysis examines the utilization and impact of judicial precedents in the legal systems of Malaysia and Nigeria. The study explores how courts in these two countries interpret and apply legal precedents, examining the role of precedent in shaping legal decisions, the factors influencing its application, and the effects on the development of jurisprudence. Through an in-depth examination of case law and judicial practices, this research uncovers the similarities, disparities, and potential lessons that can be drawn from the experiences of both nations. It provides valuable insights into the evolution of legal systems and the adaptation of common law principles in different cultural and legal contexts.