Articles | Open Access |

ADAPTING LANGUAGE TEACHING METHODS: COMPARATIVE ACCEPTABILITY OF GTM AND CLT IN BANGLADESH'S RURAL SECONDARY EDUCATION

Md. Maqbool , Dept. of English Language & Literature, Jatiya Kabi Kazi Nazrul Islam University Trishal, Mymensingh, Bangladesh

Abstract

This study explores the comparative acceptability of two prominent language teaching methods—Grammar Translation Method (GTM) and Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)—among teachers in rural secondary schools in Bangladesh. Despite the global shift towards communicative approaches, many rural schools continue to employ traditional methods like GTM due to contextual and resource-based challenges. Through a mixed-methods approach, this research surveys teachers' perceptions, experiences, and preferences regarding both teaching methods. Findings indicate that while CLT is favored for fostering communicative competence, teachers in rural areas express concerns about its practicality, given the lack of resources and the predominant focus on examinations. Conversely, GTM is viewed as more feasible within the constraints of rural schools, though it is acknowledged as less effective in developing students' language skills for real-world communication. The study highlights the need for context-sensitive adaptations in language teaching methods, balancing traditional approaches with modern pedagogies to meet the diverse needs of rural learners.

Keywords

Grammar Translation Method (GTM), Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), Language Teaching Methods

References

Brumfit, C. J., and K. Johnson, eds.1979. The Communicative Approach to Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gower, Roger, Diane Phillips, and Steve Walters. 1983. Teaching Practice Handbook. Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann English Language Teaching.

Huda, Mohammad Emdadul. 2012. “Designing CLT Materials for the Context of Bangladesh: Theories and Realities.” Journal of Nazrul University, 1(1): 35-48.

Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2004. Techniques and Principles of Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Littlewood, William. 1981. Communicative Language Leaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, David. 1989. Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, Jack, John Platt, and Heidi Weber. 1985. Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. Harlow: Longman.

Richards, J.C., and S. T. Rodgers. 2001. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ‏

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

ADAPTING LANGUAGE TEACHING METHODS: COMPARATIVE ACCEPTABILITY OF GTM AND CLT IN BANGLADESH’S RURAL SECONDARY EDUCATION. (2024). International Journal of Language, Literature and Culture, 4(12), 1-4. https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijllc/article/view/1818