Articles | Open Access |

Evaluative Adjectives in Flux: A Corpus-Based Appraisal of Stance Construction in Contemporary Ukrainian Media Discourse

Dr. Olena V. Kovalenko , Department of Slavic Linguistics, Kyiv Mohyla Academy, Kyiv, Ukraine

Abstract

Background: The expression of evaluation, opinion, and stance is a fundamental function of language, with adjectives serving as a primary lexical resource for this purpose. While frameworks like Appraisal Theory provide robust models for analyzing evaluative language, their application has predominantly focused on English. There is a need for more research into how evaluation is realized through the distinct morpho-semantic resources of other languages, such as Ukrainian, particularly within the influential domain of media discourse.

Aims: This article provides a corpus-based analysis of the form and function of evaluative adjectives in contemporary Ukrainian online news media. It aims to (1) identify the dominant patterns of Attitude (Affect, Judgement, Appreciation) expressed through adjectives; (2) analyze the role of specific morphological features, such as complex adjectival formations, in graduating evaluative meaning; and (3) determine how these linguistic choices contribute to the construction of authorial stance.

Methods: A specialized corpus of articles from major Ukrainian news websites was compiled. Using a qualitative and quantitative discourse analysis approach, instances of evaluative adjectives were manually identified and coded according to Martin & White's (2005) Appraisal framework [10]. A subsequent morphological analysis focused on identifying patterns in the formation and function of complex and derived adjectives central to Ukrainian word-formation [8, 14].

Results: The analysis reveals a high frequency of adjectives expressing 'Judgement' and 'Appreciation', often used to frame political and social actors and events. A key finding is the productive use of complex adjectives as a powerful resource for intensifying evaluation (Graduation) and encoding nuanced semantic prosody. These formations are shown to be a salient feature in constructing polarized stances within the discourse.

Conclusion: The study concludes that complex evaluative adjectives are a crucial, language-specific resource for inscribing stance in Ukrainian media. The findings contribute to a cross-linguistic validation and refinement of Appraisal Theory and offer a deeper understanding of the grammatical and discursive mechanisms of opinion-making in modern Ukrainian.

Keywords

Evaluative adjectives, Appraisal Theory, corpus linguistics

References

Bednarek, M. (2006). Evaluation and cognition: Inscribing, evoking and provoking opinion. In H. Pishwa (Ed.), Language and memory: Aspects of knowledge representation (pp. 187–221). Mouton de Gruyter.

Bednarek, M. (2009). Dimensions of evaluation: Cognitive and linguistic perspectives. Pragmatics and Cognition, 17(1), 146–175.

Englebretson, R. (2007). Stancetaking in discourse. John Benjamins.

Hatzivassiloglou, V., & Wiebe, J. (2000, July 31). Effects of adjective orientation and gradability on sentence subjectivity. 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Saarbrücken, Germany.

Herman, T. (2022). When evaluative adjectives prevent contradiction in a debate. Argumentation, 36, 155–176.

Hunston, S. (2019). Language patterns and ATTITUDE revisited: Adjective patterns, attitude and appraisal. Functions of Language, 26(3), 343–371.

Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford University Press.

Khaliman, O. V. (2019). Degrees of comparison of adjectives: From norm violation to tradition (based on the dictionary of A. Nelyuba, Ye Redko. Word formation of independent Ukraine, 2012–2016). Studia Ukrainica Posnaniensia, VII, 21–28.

Kosmeda, T. A. (2021). Feminine metaphor in the language of contemporary Russian‑ and Ukrainian‑language newspapers (on the example of the media image modeling of Yulia Tymoshenko). Przegląd Rusycystyczny, 4(176), 1–24.

Martin, J., & White, P. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.

Marzá, N. E. (2011). A comprehensive corpus‑based study of the use of evaluative adjectives in promotional hotel websites. ODISEA, 12(2011), 97–123.

Radko, O. H. (2017). The folklore basis of individually authored adjectives in the linguistic creativity of Ukrainian poets of the 20th–21st centuries. Linguistic Studies, 61, 161–168.

Rocklage, M. D., & Fazio, R. H. (2014). The evaluative lexicon: Adjective use as a means of assessing and distinguishing attitude valence, extremity, and emotionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 214–227.

Rud, O. M. (2020). Complex adjectives as a means of verbalizing the image of Ukraine. International Humanitarian University Herald. Philology, 46(2), 100–103.

Ryzantseva, D. V. (2013). The adjective in modern Ukrainian in the framework of the grammar of evaluation [Doctoral dissertation, H. S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University].

Syrett, K. (2024). Challenges and strategies for acquiring adjectives. Language and Linguistics Compass, 18(6), e70000.

Whitelaw, C., Garg, N., & Argamon, S. (2005, October 31). Using appraisal groups for sentiment analysis. International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 625–631), Bremen, Germany.

Wiebe, J., Wilson, T., & Cardie, C. (2005). Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Language Resources and Evaluation, 39(2), 165–210.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Evaluative Adjectives in Flux: A Corpus-Based Appraisal of Stance Construction in Contemporary Ukrainian Media Discourse. (2025). International Journal of Language, Literature and Culture, 5(11), 1-11. https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijllc/article/view/7390