Articles
| Open Access |
https://doi.org/10.55640/
Integrating Autonomous and Robotic Systems for Safety-Critical Mining Operations: A Human-Centered, Systems Engineering Perspective on Underground and Surface Automation
Dr. Mateo L. Carranzardt1 , School of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, The University of Queensland, AustraliaAbstract
The mining industry has entered a decisive period of technological transformation driven by the convergence of automation, robotics, sensing, and artificial intelligence. Across both surface and underground operations, autonomous and semi-autonomous systems are increasingly deployed to address long-standing challenges related to worker safety, operational efficiency, productivity variability, and environmental constraints. Despite significant technical progress, the implementation of automation in mining remains uneven, constrained not only by engineering limitations but also by systemic safety risks, human–machine interaction challenges, and the complexity of integrating autonomous systems into legacy mining environments. This research article presents a comprehensive, theory-driven examination of autonomous and robotic systems in mining, synthesizing contemporary developments in unmanned aerial vehicles, unmanned ground vehicles, longwall automation, computer-vision-based collision avoidance, and sensing technologies within a unified systems engineering and human-systems integration framework.
Methodologically, the study adopts a structured qualitative synthesis approach grounded in systems engineering principles, functional safety doctrine, and human-systems integration theory. Findings reveal that productivity gains and safety improvements are most pronounced when automation is embedded within a coherent safety lifecycle that incorporates functional safety standards, human-centered design, and continuous risk assessment. Conversely, failures in mining automation frequently stem from inadequate integration of sensing, control, and human oversight rather than from deficiencies in autonomy algorithms alone.
The discussion critically interrogates prevailing assumptions surrounding full autonomy, highlighting limitations related to trust calibration, situational awareness degradation, and regulatory ambiguity. The article concludes by proposing future research and implementation pathways that emphasize adaptive autonomy, resilient sensing architectures, and the formal integration of human-systems integration into mining automation governance. By reframing automation as a socio-technical safety system rather than a discrete technological artifact, this research contributes a foundational perspective for safer, more sustainable mining operations in the coming decades.
Keywords
Mining automation, autonomous systems, underground mining safety
References
Abdukodirov, A., &Benndorf, J. (2025). Recent developments in path planning for unmanned ground vehicles in underground mining environment. Mining, 5(2), 33.
Booher, H. (2003). Handbook of human systems integration. Wiley.
Burgess-Limerick, R. (2020). Human-systems integration for the safe implementation of automation. Mining, Metallurgy& Exploration, 37, 1799–1806.
Folds, D. J. (2015). Systems engineering perspective on human systems integration. In D. A. Boehm-Davis, F. T. Durso, & J. D. Lee (Eds.), APA handbook of human systems integration (pp. 21–35). American Psychological Association.
Global Mining Guidelines Group. (2020). Guideline for applying functional safety to autonomous systems in mining.
Green, J. J., Bosscha, P. A., Candy, L., Hlophe, K., Coetzee, S., & Brink, S. (2010). Can a robot improve mine safety?
Imam, M., Baïna, K., Tabii, Y., Ressami, E. M., Adlaoui, Y., Benzakour, I., & Abdelwahed, E. H. (2023). The future of mine safety: A comprehensive review of anti-collision systems based on computer vision in underground mines. Sensors, 23(9), 4294.
INCOSE. (2021). System safety mission & objectives.
International Electrotechnical Commission. (2013). Functional safety. Electropedia.
International Organization for Standardization. (2015). Safety of machinery – Safety-related parts of control systems – Part 1: General principles for design (ISO 13849-1:2015).
International Organization for Standardization. (2019). Earth-moving machinery and mining — Autonomous and semi-autonomous machine system safety (ISO 17757:2019).
Li, H., Savkin, A. V., & Vucetic, B. (2020). Autonomous area exploration and mapping in underground mine environments by unmanned aerial vehicles. Robotica, 38(3), 442–456.
Long, M., Schafrik, S., Kolapo, P., Agioutantis, Z., & Sottile, J. (2024). Equipment and operations automation in mining: A review. Machines, 12(10), 713.
Pastore, T., &Djapic, V. (2010). Improving autonomy and control of autonomous surface vehicles in port protection and mine countermeasure scenarios. Journal of Field Robotics, 27(6), 903–914.
Ralston, J. C., Reid, D. C., Dunn, M. T., & Hainsworth, D. W. (2015). Longwall automation: Delivering enabling technology to achieve safer and more productive underground mining. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 25(6), 865–876.
Ralston, J., Reid, D., Hargrave, C., & Hainsworth, D. (2014). Sensing for advancing mining automation capability: A review of underground automation technology development. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 24(3), 305–310.
Shrivastava, A. (2024). Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) in mining sector: Enhancing productivity and safety. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Mateo L. Carranzardt1

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.