Articles | Open Access |

The Dialectics of Global Accounting Convergence: A Critical Analysis of Institutional, Cultural, And Technological Drivers in The Post-IFRS Era

Julian Antonelli , Department of International Finance and Accounting, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Abstract

This research provides a comprehensive examination of the evolution of global financial reporting, tracing the trajectory from localized accounting traditions to the contemporary push for universal standards. By synthesizing historical institutionalism with modern technological paradigms, the article analyzes the socio-political and economic tensions inherent in the international harmonization debate. Drawing on a diverse range of case studies including China, the European Union, and emerging economies in Eastern Europe and the Middle East, the study explores how political ideology, national culture, and state-profession relationships shape the adoption and implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The research further investigates the transition from manual reconciliation to AI-assisted multi-GAAP frameworks, arguing that while technology offers a technical solution to complexity, it does not eliminate the underlying institutional frictions. The findings suggest that "convergence" is not a linear process of unification but a continuous negotiation between global capital demands and local sovereignty. The article concludes by proposing a refined theoretical model for understanding accounting as a social and institutional practice rather than a mere technical exercise.

Keywords

Global Accounting Convergence, IFRS, Institutional Theory, Political Ideology

References

Alexander, D., H. de Brébisson, C. Circa, E. Eberhartinger, R. Fasiello, M. Grottke, and J. Krasodomska. 2018. Philosophy of language and accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 31 (7): 1957–1980. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-06-2017-2979.

Anjali Kale. (2025). AI-Assisted Multi-GAAP Reconciliation Frameworks: A Paradigm Shift in Global Financial Practices. The American Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(07), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajas/Volume07Issue07-07

Armstrong, C.S., W.R. Guay, and J.P. Weber. 2010. The role of information and financial reporting in corporate governance and debt contracting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (2–3): 179–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.001.

Arnold, P.J. et al. 2001. Globalization and the state–profession relationship: The case the Bank of Credit and Commerce International. Accounting Organizations and Society.

Ball, R. 2006. International financial reporting standards (IFRS): Pros and cons for investors. Accounting and Business Research 36 (sup1): 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2006.9730040.

Ball, R. 2016. IFRS-10 years later. Accounting and Business Research 46 (5): 545–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2016.1182710.

Ball, R., S.P. Kothari, and A. Robin. 2000. The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 29 (1): 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4101(00)00012-4.

Ball, R., X.I. Li, and L. Shivakumar. 2015. Contractibility and transparency of financial statement information prepared under IFRS: Evidence from debt contracts around IFRS adoption. Journal of Accounting Research 53 (5): 915–963. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12095.

Chiapello, E. et al. 2009. An unprecedented privatisation of mandatory standard-setting: The case of European accounting policy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting.

D’Arcy, A. 2001. Accounting classification and the international harmonisation debate-An empirical investigation. Accounting, Organizations and Society.

Ezzamel, M. et al. 2007. Political ideology and accounting regulation in China. Accounting Organizations and Society.

Graham, L.E. et al. 1997. Cultural and economic influences on current accounting standards in the People's Republic of China. International Journal of Accounting.

Hopwood, A.G. 1983. On trying to study accounting in the contexts in which it operates. Accounting, Organizations and Society.

Irvine, H. 2008. The global institutionalization of financial reporting: The case of the United Arab Emirates. Accounting Forum.

Jermakowicz, E.K. et al. 1996. The new accounting standards in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland vis-a-vis International Accounting Standards and European Union Directives. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation.

Kerzner, H., 2018. Project management best practices: Achieving global excellence. John Wiley & Sons.

Ketterer, J.A., 2017. Digital finance: New times, new challenges, new opportunities.

Kolk, A. and Lenfant, F., 2016. Hybrid business models for peace and reconciliation. Business Horizons, 59(5), pp.503-524.

Kousalya, G., Balakrishnan, P. and Raj, C.P., 2017. Automated workflow scheduling in selfadaptive clouds (pp. 65-83). Berlin: Springer.

Liu, J.Y., 2018. An internal control system that includes corporate social responsibility for social sustainability in the new era. Sustainability, 10(10), p.3382.

Mahmood, A., 2018. BIG DATA ANALYTICS AND ITS ROLE IN DECISION MAKING. Computer Science Bulletin, 1(02), pp.139-149.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Julian Antonelli. (2026). The Dialectics of Global Accounting Convergence: A Critical Analysis of Institutional, Cultural, And Technological Drivers in The Post-IFRS Era. International Journal of Data Science and Machine Learning, 6(01), 65-71. https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijdsml/article/view/11786