Articles | Open Access |

ANALYZING BIRTH INTERVALS: USUAL CLOSED VS. MOST RECENT CLOSED APPROACH

Pankaj Yadav , Department of Statistics & DST-CIMS, Banaras Hindu University, India

Abstract

Birth intervals, the time duration between consecutive births, hold significance in demographic studies and family planning research. Two common approaches for measuring birth intervals are the "Usual Closed" and "Most Recent Closed" methods. This study investigates the differences between these two approaches and their implications for demographic analyses. Through an analysis of birth interval data, we compare the results obtained using these methods, examining their strengths, limitations, and potential impacts on fertility and family planning programs. This research sheds light on the importance of choosing an appropriate birth interval definition in demographic studies.

Keywords

Birth Intervals, Usual Closed Approach, Most Recent Closed Approach

References

Abul-ata, M. F. (1987). Stochastic Models of Birth Intervals According to data Ascertainment Method and Relevant Fertility Indices. PhD thesis, Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Institute of Statistics.

Fisher, R. A. (1934). The effect of the methods of ascertainment upon the estimation of frequencies. Annals of Eugenics, 6:13-25.

Pandey, A., Dwivedi, S. N., and Mishra, R. N. (1998). Distribution of last closed birth intervals with some bio-social components: A stochastic model and its applications. Mathematical Population Studies, 7 (1):1-27.

Poole, K. (1973). Fertility measure based on birth interval data. Theoritical Population Biology, 4:357-387.

Rao, C. R. (1965). On Discrete Distributions Arising Out of Method of Ascertainment, chapter Classical and contagious distributions, pages 320-332. Statistical publishing society, Calcutta.

Sehgal, J. M. (1971). Indices of Fertility Derived from Data on the Length of Birth Intervals, Using Different Ascertainment Plans. PhD thesis, Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Institute of Statistics, Mimco Series 768.

Sharma, S. S. (2004). A Study on Some Mathematical Models for Birth Intervals. PhD thesis, Banaras Hindu University. Sheps, M. C. and Menken, J. A. (1972). Distribution of birth interval according to the

sampling frame. Theoritical Population Biology, 3:1-26.

Sheps, M. C. and Menken, J. A. (1973). Mathematical Models of Conception and Birth. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

Sheps, M. C., Menken, J. A., Ridley, J. C., and Linger, J. W. (1970). Truncation effect in closed and open birth interval data. Journal of American Statistical Association, 65(330):678-693.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

ANALYZING BIRTH INTERVALS: USUAL CLOSED VS. MOST RECENT CLOSED APPROACH. (2022). International Journal of Data Science and Machine Learning, 2(01), 01-04. https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijdsml/article/view/48