Articles
| Open Access | Cost–Performance–Efficiency Framework for Cloud Data Warehousing: A Comprehensive Study of Snowflake Optimization and Cloud Cost Reduction Practices
Joey Green , Department of Computer Science, University of EdinburghAbstract
This study presents a comprehensive, practice-oriented, and theoretically grounded framework for optimizing cost and performance in cloud data warehousing, with a focused application to Snowflake deployments. Building on practitioner guidance, vendor recommendations, and peer-reviewed scholarship, the research synthesizes principles from cloud cost optimization, workload management, query tuning, elasticity and concurrency control, and architectural design to produce an integrated five-layer framework for practical implementation and empirical evaluation. The abstracted framework links operational levers—such as virtual warehouse sizing, auto-suspend/autoresume controls, clustering keys, micro-partition pruning, caching strategies, and concurrency scaling—to measurable outcomes in cost, latency, throughput, and resource utilization. We describe a rigorous methodological approach that combines comparative literature synthesis, scenario-driven modeling of enterprise workloads, and descriptive analysis grounded in previously reported benchmark studies and practitioner case reports. Key findings indicate that coordinated application of elasticity controls, workload isolation, and intelligent data-clustering can reduce compute costs while preserving or improving query latency for a broad class of analytic workloads (Chen & Patel, 2022; Zhang & Alvarez, 2022). The analysis further highlights inherent trade-offs: aggressive cost saving through smaller, highly time-sliced warehouses increases operational complexity and can degrade tail-latency and concurrency-sensitive throughput unless supported by concurrency scaling or workload routing (Alvarez & Park, 2022; Morgan & Gupta, 2023). We discuss practical guidelines for implementing the framework in industry contexts such as insurance, manufacturing, and enterprise analytics, and provide an extended exploration of limitations, organizational considerations, and research directions. The study consolidates diverse evidence to produce a unified, actionable roadmap for engineers and decision-makers striving to optimize Snowflake-based data warehousing in cloud environments while balancing cost, performance, and operational risk (Malviya, 2025; Spot by NetApp, n.d.; Sigmoid, n.d.).
Keywords
Cloud data warehousing, Snowflake optimization, cloud cost reduction, query tuning
References
Spot by NetApp. "Cloud Cost Optimization: 15 Best Practices to Reduce Your Cloud Bill." [Online]. Available: https://spot.io/resources/cloud-cost/cloud-cost-optimization-15-ways-to-optimize-yourcloud/
Sigmoid. "Best practices for snowflake implementation." [Online]. Available: https://www.sigmoid.com/ebooks-whitepapers/snowflake-implementation/#chapter-1
Chandrakanth Lekkala. "Cloud-Based Data Warehousing Optimization Techniques," ResearchGate, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382441587_CloudBased_Data_Warehousing_Optimization_Techniques
Samartha Chandrashekar. "Best practices to optimize Snowflake spend," Medium, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/snowflake/best-practices-to-optimize-snowflake-spend-73b8f66d16c1
ATMECS Content Team. "The Rise of Industry Cloud Platforms," ATMECS Global, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://atmecs.com/the-rise-of-industry-cloud-platforms/
Brendt Evenden. "How Real-Time Analytics is Transforming the Manufacturing Industry," LinkedIn, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-real-time-analytics-transformingmanufacturing-industry-evenden-o3pec
PVML Team. "Essential Features of an Enterprise Data Platform for Optimized Performance," PVML, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://pvml.com/blog/essential-features-of-an-enterprise-data-platformfor-optimized-performance/
Chen, L., & Patel, K. (2022). Performance Comparison of OLAP Workloads in SQL Server and Snowflake. Information Systems Science Journal, 18(2), 67–84.
Malviya, S. (2025). A Five-Layer Framework for Cost Optimization in Snowflake: Applied to P&C Insurance Workloads. The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research, 7(07), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajiir/Volume07Issue07-04
Alvarez, F., & Park, S. (2022). Concurrency Scaling in Multi-Tenant Environments. Enterprise Data Journal, 7(4), 145–161.
Morgan, C., & Gupta, N. (2023). Cost vs. Performance Trade-offs in Cloud Warehousing. Business Intelligence Quarterly, 29(1), 34–49.
Zhao, H., & Aravind, N. (2024). Intelligent Tuning Mechanisms in Serverless Architectures. Next-Gen Computing Research, 11(1), 99–117.
Deshmukh, A., & Lee, C. (2021). Performance Optimization in Relational Databases: Principles and Practice. International Journal of Information Systems, 29(3), 201–219.
Zhang, Q., & Alvarez, R. (2022). Snowflake Performance Tuning Techniques: Elasticity, Concurrency, and Query Optimization. Cloud Computing Research Journal, 14(1), 77–94.
Foster, J., & Prasad, M. (2023). Clustering and Caching in Snowflake: A New Paradigm for Performance. Data Architecture Review, 6(2), 118–134.
Morgan, C., & Zhao, H. (2023). Cost Efficiency in Cloud Data Warehousing: Metrics and Optimization. Journal of Cloud Analytics, 11(4), 44–61.
Wang, J., & Ibrahim, M. (2022). Cloud-based Performance Benchmarking of SQL Warehouses. International Journal of Database Performance, 9(3), 123–138.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Joey Green

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.