The global semiconductor industry is a highly complex and interdependent network that has become increasingly vulnerable to supply chain disruptions, ranging from geopolitical tensions to pandemic-induced shocks. This research examines the multifaceted dynamics of risk management and resilience strategies within semiconductor supply chains, emphasizing the integration of agility, coordination, and mitigation measures. Drawing on extensive literature, this study investigates how supply chain risk impacts operational performance and explores mechanisms such as supply chain integration, contract flexibility, process simplification, and digital twin applications to enhance resilience. Methodologically, the study synthesizes empirical findings from prior research with theoretical frameworks on supply chain risk and resilience, offering a descriptive analysis of coordination practices, capacity reservation strategies, and reshoring initiatives. Results indicate that effective risk management, when mediated by integration and agility, significantly enhances supply chain robustness, responsiveness, and adaptability. Furthermore, emerging strategies such as digital twins and advanced simulation modeling provide actionable insights for proactive disruption management. The discussion critically examines the implications of these findings for practitioners and policymakers, highlighting limitations related to data availability, modeling assumptions, and industry-specific variability. Future research avenues include the exploration of cross-industry comparative analyses, integration of sustainability metrics into risk assessment, and the role of artificial intelligence in predictive supply chain resilience. Overall, this research provides a comprehensive theoretical and practical framework for managing risk and fostering resilience in global semiconductor supply chains, contributing to the broader discourse on supply chain sustainability and strategic operational management.

Semiconductor supply chain, risk management, resilience, agility

Jajja, M. S. S., Chatha, K. A., & Farooq, S. (2018). Impact of supply chain risk on agility performance: Mediating role of supply chain integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 205, 118–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.032

Kern, D., Moser, R., Hartmann, E., & Moder, M. (2012). Supply risk management: Model development and empirical analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 42(1), 60–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031211202472

Li, G., Fan, H., Lee, P. K. C., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2015). Joint supply chain risk management: An agency and collaboration perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.021

Li, J., Luo, X., Wang, Q., & Zhou, W. (2021). Supply chain coordination through capacity reservation contract and quantity flexibility contract. Omega (United Kingdom), 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102195

Liao, Z., Tantai, B., Abdul-Hamid, A. Q., Mukhtar, D., & Ali, M. H. (2025). Exploring resilience in the downstream supply chain of the semiconductor industry: The mediating roles of risk mitigation, process simplification, and flexibility. International Journal of Production Economics, 281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109530

Mahachi, M., Moukala, H., Ismail, A., Hopf, A., & Ehm, H. (2022). Simulating the COVID19-pandemic and its impact on the semiconductor supply chain: Enabling a supply chain risk management framework. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(10), 2215–2220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.037

Moktadir, M. A., & Ren, J. (2024). Global semiconductor supply chain resilience challenges and mitigation strategies: A novel integrated decomposed fuzzy set Delphi, WINGS and QFD model. International Journal of Production Economics, 273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109280

Münch, C., & Hartmann, E. (2023). Transforming resilience in the context of a pandemic: results from a cross-industry case study exploring supply chain viability. International Journal of Production Research, 61(8), 2544–2562. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2029610

Nel, J. D. (2024). The role of supply chain risk mitigation strategies to manage supply chain disruptions. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 18. https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v18i0.1035

NVIDIA. (2024). What is a digital twin? https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/glossary/digital-twin/

Peck, H. (2005). Drivers of supply chain vulnerability: An integrated framework. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35(4), 210–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030510599904

Lulla, K. (2025). Reshoring GPU production: Testing strategy adaptations for US-based factories. International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 38(10s), 2411–2440.

Gereffi, G. (1999). International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain. Journal of International Economics, 48, 37–70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022199698000750

Marquez, J. (2005). Estimating elasticities for U.S. trade in services. International Finance Discussion Papers, No. 836. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. https://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2005/836/ifdp836.pdf

Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) (2019). Notice of modification of action: China’s acts, policies, and practices related to technology transfer, intellectual property, and innovation. Federal Register, 84, 2–5.

Organisation for Economic Co Operation and Development (OECD) (2024). Chips, nodes and wafers: A taxonomy for semiconductor data collection. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/08/chips-nodes-and-wafers_1189c2a2/f68de895-en.pdf.