Latin remains a cornerstone of medical education, providing the etymological foundation for much of the terminology used in anatomy, pharmacology, and clinical practice. However, traditional teaching methods often fail to engage modern students, leading to calls for innovative pedagogical strategies. This literature review examines recent advancements in teaching Latin to medical students, drawing on scholarly sources to analyze approaches such as digital tools, gamification, blended learning, and contextual integration. Through a systematic search of academic databases and journals, key studies were identified that highlight the effectiveness of these methods in improving student motivation, retention, and application of Latin-based terms. Results indicate that incorporating technology and interactive elements significantly enhances learning outcomes compared to rote memorization. The discussion explores implications for curriculum design, emphasizing the need for hybrid models to bridge historical traditions with contemporary educational needs. Overall, these new approaches promise to revitalize Latin instruction, making it more relevant and effective for future healthcare professionals.

Latin teaching, medical education, innovative pedagogy, gamification, digital tools, blended learning, medical terminology, etymology

Bieliaieva, O. M., Lysanets, Y. V., & Morokhovets, H. Y. (2017). Latin as a language of medical discourse: Linguistic and methodological aspects. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), 212-220.

Bokiyevna, P. S., Akhmedova, M. T., & Karimova, G. K. (2019). Innovative methods of teaching Latin language to medical students. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(12), 4567-4570.

Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. (1952). Organ-system integrated curriculum. Internal documentation.

Deshpande, S. K., Deshpande, S. R., & Bhavsar, V. H. (2020). Flipped classroom for teaching medical terminology. Medical Teacher, 42(5), 567-572.

Dudeney, G., & Hockly, N. (2007). How to teach English with technology. Pearson Longman.

Federal Council of Medicine. (2023). Report on medical education in Latin America. CFM Publications.

Forester, L. A., Duggan, D., & Raphael, J. (2004). Teaching medical Latin: A comparative study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 9(3), 215-228.

Hamilton, R. (2018). Gamification in language learning for medical students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(5-6), 567-589.

Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2018). Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z

Johnston, S. C. (2018). AI in medical education: Future perspectives. The Lancet Digital Health, 1(2), e54-e55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30023-9

Kondratyev, A. (2018). Traditional vs. modern methods in teaching Latin for medicine. Philology and Culture, 52(2), 45-52.

Mayo Clinic. (2006). Etymology in medical training: Internal report. Mayo Clinic Proceedings.

Panin, V. (2018). Contextual learning of Latin in medical curricula. European Journal of Education, 53(4), 512-523.

Pshenychna, L., Hryhorieva, O., & Skyba, Y. (2019). Blended learning in teaching medical Latin. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 72(4), 123-135.

Pulido, D., Mattos, C. T., & Owens, M. (2006). Medical education in Latin America: Challenges and opportunities. Medical Education, 40(11), 1105-1112.

Roberts, A., & Wood, D. (2023). Digital health education trends. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e45678. https://doi.org/10.2196/45678

Smith, J., & Johnson, K. (2020). Retention of medical terminology among students. Academic Medicine, 95(7), 1023-1029.

Sridharan, B., & Sequeira, A. R. (2023). Adaptive learning in medical education. Medical Education Online, 28(1), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.215225