Articles
| Open Access |
https://doi.org/10.55640/
Pedagogical Reconfiguration in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Motivational, Ethical, and Epistemic Dimensions of AI-Integrated Learning Ecologies
Dr. Matthew Clark , Faculty of Education, University of Melbourne, AustraliaAbstract
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into educational contexts has initiated a profound reconfiguration of pedagogical theory, instructional practice, and the epistemic foundations of learning. Generative AI systems, particularly large language models such as ChatGPT, are no longer peripheral technological tools but have become active participants in knowledge production, assessment, and instructional mediation. This article develops a comprehensive, theoretically grounded analysis of AI-integrated pedagogy by synthesizing perspectives from motivation theory, ethical educational design, teacher professional knowledge, and learning ecology frameworks. Drawing strictly on contemporary and foundational literature, the study conceptualizes generative AI as a pedagogical actor that reshapes intrinsic motivation, learner autonomy, and instructional authority. A qualitative, integrative methodology is employed to examine how AI alters pedagogical relationships, assessment practices, and inclusivity across educational levels. The findings suggest that AI integration is not pedagogically neutral; rather, it redistributes epistemic agency, redefines teacher expertise, and challenges conventional notions of academic integrity and learner authenticity. Through deep theoretical elaboration, the article argues that effective AI pedagogy requires a shift from instrumental adoption toward ethically informed, motivation-sensitive, and epistemically transparent learning ecologies. The discussion highlights tensions between automation and human judgment, equity and access, and innovation and regulation. The article concludes by proposing a conceptual framework for responsible AI pedagogy that aligns intrinsic motivation, ethical governance, and professional teacher knowledge, offering implications for curriculum design, teacher education, and future research in AI-enhanced education.
Keywords
Artificial intelligence in education, generative AI pedagogy, intrinsic motivation
References
Asad, M. M., Shahzad, S., Shah, S. H. A., Sherwani, F., & Almusharraf, N. M. (2024). ChatGPT as artificial intelligence-based generative multimedia for English writing pedagogy: Challenges and opportunities from an educator’s perspective. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-02-2024-0021
Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Learning to work with the black box: Pedagogy for a world with artificial intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1160–1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13337
Carradini, S. (2024). On the current moment in AI: Introduction to special issue on effects of artificial intelligence tools in technical communication pedagogy, practice, and research. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 38(3), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519241239638
Celik, I. (2023). Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107468.
Chen, X., Xie, H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020). A multi-perspective study on artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100005.
Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., & Searsmith, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence for education: Knowledge and its assessment in AI-enabled learning ecologies. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(12), 1229–1245.
Dai, Y., Lin, Z., Liu, A., Dai, D., & Wang, W. (2024). Effect of an analogy-based approach of artificial intelligence pedagogy in upper primary schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(8), 159–186.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Conceptualizations of intrinsic motivation and self-determination. In Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior (pp. 11–40). Springer.
Garg, S., & Sharma, S. (2020). Impact of artificial intelligence in special need education to promote inclusive pedagogy. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(7), 523–527.
Grover, P., Kar, A. K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). Understanding artificial intelligence adoption in operations management. Annals of Operations Research, 308(1), 177–213.
Lee, I., & Perret, B. (2022). Preparing high school teachers to integrate AI methods into STEM classrooms. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 36(11), 12783–12791.
Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100020.
Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development.
Stathopoulou, A., Siamagka, N.-T., & Christodoulides, G. (2019). A multi-stakeholder view of social media as a supporting tool in higher education. European Management Journal, 37(4), 421–431.
Williams, R. T. (2024). The ethical implications of using generative chatbots in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1331607.
Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research and future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100025.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Matthew Clark

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.