Articles | Open Access |

A Deep Learning Approach to Electromagnetic Compatibility Test Signal Prediction Using LSTM Networks

Ravi Patel , Department of Electronics, National Institute of Technology, Trichy, India

Abstract

Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) testing is a critical step in the development and certification of electronic devices to ensure they function correctly in their intended electromagnetic environment without causing or being susceptible to unacceptable electromagnetic interference [1]. EMC tests often involve applying specific electromagnetic test signals and monitoring the device's response or measuring its emissions. These test signals, particularly those used for immunity testing (e.g., transient pulses, modulated sine waves), are inherently time-series data with complex temporal characteristics. Accurately predicting the behavior or required parameters of these test signals under various conditions or extrapolating limited measurements could significantly optimize testing procedures, reduce test time, and improve the efficiency of EMC compliance efforts [27]. Traditional signal processing techniques [7, 11, 12, 13, 14] may struggle with the non-linear and potentially non-stationary nature of some EMC phenomena and test signals [5, 6]. Deep learning, specifically Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, has demonstrated exceptional capabilities in modeling and predicting complex sequential data [15, 16, 17, 18, 19]. This article proposes and outlines a methodology for predicting EMC test signal characteristics using LSTM networks. We discuss the conceptual framework for data acquisition, model architecture design, training, and evaluation, drawing upon principles from time-series analysis [5, 6], neural networks [2, 4, 10, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19], and signal processing [7, 11, 12, 13, 14]. The potential benefits include enhanced test efficiency, improved understanding of signal behavior, and the possibility of generating synthetic test data for simulation purposes [24].

Keywords

Electromagnetic Compatibility, Test Signal Prediction, LSTM Network, Deep Learning, Signal Processing

References

Paul, C. R., Scully, R. C., Steffka, M. A. (2022). Introduction to electromagnetic compatibility[M]. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.com/books?hl=zh-CN&lr=&id=AeLEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA11&dq=Introduction+to+electromagnetic+compatibility&ots=ThzFzj3OUh&sig=3KQeOXYYwKDFcHRBwhtTNFCzgCE#v=onepage&q=Introduction%20to

Lapedes, A., & Farber, R. (1987). Nonlinear signal processing using neural networks: Prediction and system modelling (No. LA-UR-87-2662; CONF-8706130-4). https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5470451

Yang, J., Zhang, Y. (2005). Application research of support vector machines in condition trend prediction of mechanical equipment. In Wang, J., Liao, XF., Yi, Z. (eds) Advances in Neural Networks – ISNN 2005. ISNN 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3498. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/11427469_136

Yan, Z., Zhang, H., Sun, J., Yang, Y., & Xia, G. (2020). Development and application of aero-engine experimental data mining algorithm library. In International Conference on Sensing, Measurement & Data Analytics in the era of Artificial Intelligence (ICSMD) (pp. 264–269). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMD50554.2020.9261719

Wang, Y., Zhang, H., Shi, Z., et al. (2023). Nonlinear time series analysis and prediction of general aviation accidents based on multi-timescales[J]. Aerospace, 10(8), 714.

Spiridonakos, M. D., & Fassois, S. D. (2014). Non-stationary random vibration modelling via FS-TARMA models[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 47(1–2), 175–224.

Brodzik, A. K., & Tolimieri, R. (2000). Extrapolation of band-limited signals and the finite Zak transform[J]. Signal Processing, 80(3), 413–423.

Wei, F., Liang, S., Zou, L. Y., et al. (2023). Extrapolation method of precipitation nowcasting radar echo based on GCA-ConvLSTM prediction network[J]. Torrential Rain and Disasters, 42(4), 427–436.

Shi, E., Li, Q., Gu, D., et al. (2018). A method of weather radar echo extrapolation based on convolutional neural networks[C]//MMM. Springer, 2018, 16–28.

Kiranyaz, S., Avci, O., Abdeljaber, O., et al. (2021). 1D convolutional neural networks and applications: A survey[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 151, 107398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107398

Zhang, F. Q., Li, J. R., Wang, G. F., et al. (2015). Micro signal spectrum estimation based on derivative extrapolation algorithm study[J]. Journal of Coal Technology, 5, 83–85. https://doi.org/10.13301/j.cnki.ct.2015.05.031

Bhatti, O. W., Torun, H. M., & Swaminathan, M. (2022). HilbertNet: A probabilistic framework for frequency response extrapolation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 64(2), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMC.2021.3119277

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

A Deep Learning Approach to Electromagnetic Compatibility Test Signal Prediction Using LSTM Networks. (2025). International Journal of Signal Processing, Embedded Systems and VLSI Design, 5(01), 05-09. https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijvsli/article/view/4198