Articles
| Open Access | COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ELECTRONIC AND PRINTED DICTIONARIES IN LANGUAGE LEARNING
Makhbuba Baxtiyarovna Sadikova, Gulchehra Zoirovna Imamova , Senior teacher, Tashkent State Technical University named after I.Karimov, UzbekistanAbstract
This article presents a comparative analysis of electronic and printed dictionaries in the process of language learning. In the context of digital transformation and technological advancement, electronic dictionaries have become widely accessible and increasingly popular among language learners. The study examines the advantages and limitations of both dictionary types in terms of accessibility, usability, speed of information retrieval, depth of lexical information, and impact on vocabulary acquisition. Special attention is given to the role of electronic dictionaries in promoting learner autonomy, interactive learning, and pronunciation support, as well as to the cognitive benefits of printed dictionaries in enhancing memory retention and analytical skills. The findings suggest that while electronic dictionaries provide convenience and immediate access to updated lexical data, printed dictionaries contribute to deeper lexical processing and better long-term retention. The study concludes that an integrated use of both electronic and printed dictionaries can significantly enhance language learning effectiveness.
Keywords
electronic dictionaries, printed dictionaries, language learning, vocabulary acquisition, lexicography, learner autonomy, digital learning.
References
Abdullayeva, M. (2025). Equity and Accessibility in Education Systems: A Global Perspective on Sdg 4 Implementation. International Journal of Formal Education, 4(12), 41–46. Retrieved from https://journals.academiczone.net/index.php/ijfe/article/view/6128
Chen, Y. (2010). Dictionary use and EFL learning: A contrastive study of pocket electronic dictionaries and paper dictionaries. International Journal of Lexicography, 23(3), 275–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecq013
Sadikova Maxbuba Baxtiyarovna. Substance and Function of the Para Logy. (2024). American Journal of Language, Literacy and Learning in STEM Education (2993-2769), 2(3), 686-688. https://www.grnjournal.us/index.php/STEM/article/view/4002
Dziemianko, A. (2012). On the usefulness of paper and electronic dictionaries for language production. International Journal of Lexicography, 25(3), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecs009
Lew, R. (2011). Studies in dictionary use: Recent developments. International Journal of Lexicography, 24(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecq039
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Maxbuba Baxtiyarovna Sadikova. PARALINGUISTICS AND SEMIOTICS AS NON-LINGUISTIC MEANS IN VOICE COMMUNICATIONS. (2024). INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MEDICINE, SCIENCE, AND EDUCATION, 1(3), 75-79.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.