Articles | Open Access |

SPATIO-TEMPORAL ASSESSMENT OF VEGETATION–TEMPERATURE INTERACTIONS IN CONTRASTING AGRO-CLIMATIC ZONES OF UZBEKISTAN USING REMOTE SENSING INDICATORS

Zokhid Mamatkulov, Rustam Oymatov, Zoirjon Abdurakhmonov, Nozimjon Teshaev , “TIIAME” National research university

Abstract

Understanding vegetation–temperature interactions is essential for climate-resilient agricultural planning in Uzbekistan’s diverse agro-climatic zones. This study analyzes the relationship between the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Land Surface Temperature (LST) during the 2024 vegetation season in two contrasting regions: Jarqo‘rg‘on district (Surxondaryo Region) in the arid south and Bo‘ka district (Tashkent Region) in the temperate north. Monthly MODIS NDVI and LST datasets were processed and temporally aligned in Google Earth Engine (GEE). Pearson correlation and linear regression models were applied to quantify vegetation responses to temperature variability. Results show notable regional differences. In Bo‘ka district, NDVI and LST exhibited a strong positive correlation (r = 0.71), with R² = 0.51, indicating that more than half of NDVI variability is explained by LST. The regression slope (b = 0.0085) suggests that vegetation greenness increases consistently with rising temperature during the active growth phase. In contrast, Jarqo‘rg‘on district demonstrated a moderate correlation (r = 0.61), with R² = 0.37, and a slightly lower regression slope (b = 0.0076), reflecting the district’s stronger heat exposure and potentially higher temperature-induced stress. These findings highlight the importance of integrating remote sensing–based vegetation and thermal indicators into regional climate adaptation strategies. The comparison demonstrates that vegetation in cooler agro-climatic zones responds more favorably to temperature increases, whereas vegetation in hotter regions exhibits dampened sensitivity due to thermal stress thresholds.

Keywords

NDVI; LST; climate–vegetation interaction; thermal stress; MODIS; temporal alignment; Pearson correlation; linear regression; climate-smart agriculture; Uzbekistan.

References

Didan, K. (2015). MOD13Q1 MODIS/Terra Vegetation Indices 16-Day L3 Global 250m SIN Grid V006. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC. https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD13Q1.006

FAO. (2021). Climate Change and Agriculture in Central Asia. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Tucker, C. J. (1979). Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 8(2), 127–150.

Uzhydromet. (2020). National Climate Change Assessment of Uzbekistan. Center of Hydrometeorological Service of Uzbekistan.

World Bank. (2019). Uzbekistan: Climate Change and Agricultural Vulnerability. Washington, DC.

Sobrino, J. A., Jiménez-Muñoz, J. C., & Paolini, L. (2004). Land surface temperature retrieval from LANDSAT TM 5. Remote Sensing of Environment, 90(4), 434–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.02.003

Tucker, C. J. (1979). Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 8(2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0.

Zhao, M., Running, S. W., & Nemani, R. (2006). Sensitivity of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) terrestrial primary production to the accuracy of meteorological reanalyses. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111(G1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JG000004

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

SPATIO-TEMPORAL ASSESSMENT OF VEGETATION–TEMPERATURE INTERACTIONS IN CONTRASTING AGRO-CLIMATIC ZONES OF UZBEKISTAN USING REMOTE SENSING INDICATORS. (2025). International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 5(12), 410-419. https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai/article/view/8546