Articles
| Open Access | PRELIMINARY SECURING OF TESTIMONY AND ITS ROLE IN THE MECHANISM OF PROOF
Nomazov Ikhtiyor Ismailovich , Tashkent State University of Law Independent ResearcherAbstract
This article offers a comprehensive analysis of the place and significance of this institute within procedural law. The main focus is on investigating the legal mechanisms aimed at ensuring the authenticity, immutability, and integrity of evidence under the existing threat of its loss (for example, in the event of witnesses' illness or the rapid volatility of evidentiary information). The article examines the procedural grounds, subjects, and implementation procedure for the preliminary securing of testimony in civil, economic, or administrative proceedings, as well as the legal force of the obtained evidence in subsequent judicial review. The research results substantiate the decisive role of this institute in ensuring fair justice and strengthening the legal protection of the parties.
Keywords
Conditions of proof, criminal process, proving, evidence, procedural form, legality, human rights, admissibility of evidence, reliability of evidence, relevance of evidence, collection of evidence.
References
Kenjetaev Ch. D. Osobennosti deponirovaniya pokazaniy v ugolovnom protsesse Respubliki Kazakhstan [Features of Testimony Deposition in the Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Kazakhstan] // Vestnik Instituta zakonodatelstva i pravovoy informatsii Respubliki Kazakhstan [Bulletin of the Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. – 2016. – No. 2 (43). – P. 43-46.
Kuzmin S. S. Yuridicheskiy analiz obyekta i obyektiivnoy storony prinuzhdeniya k dache pokazaniy [Legal Analysis of the Object and Objective Side of Coercion to Testify] // Epomen. – 2020. – No. 41. – P. 331-342.
Alexandrov R. A., Kondrat I. N., Retunskaya T. P. Predvaritelnoye i sudebnoye sledstviye v Rossii: problemy sootnosheniya [Preliminary and Judicial Investigation in Russia: Problems of Correlation] // Pravovoye pole sovremennoy ekonomiki [Legal Field of Modern Economics]. – 2012. – No. 8. – P. 134-140.
Shestakova S. D., Imanalieva U. E. Deponirovaniye pokazaniy poterpevshego i svidetelya v ugolovnom protsesse Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki [Deposition of Testimony of the Victim and Witness in the Criminal Procedure of the Kyrgyz Republic] // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii [Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia]. – 2022. – No. 1 (93). – P. 176-182.
Kanafin D.K. Sovershenstvovaniye pravovogo statusa advokata v svete razrabotki povito Ugolovno-protsessualnogo kodeksa Respubliki Kazakhstan [Improving the Legal Status of the Lawyer in Light of the Development of the Draft Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan] // Reformirovaniye ugolovnogo protsessa Respubliki Kazakhstan: materialy Petgra issledovaniya pravovoy politiki [Reforming the Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Kazakhstan: Materials of the Legal Policy Research]. Almaty, 2024.
Karaganova T.N. Sudebnoye sledstviye v ugolovnom protsesse Rossiyskoy Federatsii: avtoref dne. ... kapd. yurid. nauk [Judicial Investigation in the Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation: Abstract of DSc/PhD Thesis in Law]. M, 2008.
Zgngchepks I.A., Popov A.A. Struktura ugolovno-protsessualnogo instituta deponirovaniya pokazaniy, tsel i osnovaniya yego primeneniya [Structure of the Criminal Procedure Institution of Testimony Deposition, Purpose and Grounds for its Application] // Biblioteka kriminalistika. Nauchny zhurnal [Library of Forensics. Scientific Journal]. 2015. 1 (18).
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.