Articles | Open Access |

APPLICATION OF CLIL (CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING) METHOD IN UZBEKISTAN SCHOOLS

G’aniyeva Hayriniso Baxtiyorovna , PhD., v.b.dots
Toshpo'latova Shohinur Shavkat qizi ,

Abstract

This article analyzes the theoretical foundations, current experience and practical effectiveness of using the CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) method in secondary schools in Uzbekistan. The study examines the advantages of CLIL in teaching subject content and a foreign language simultaneously, as well as problems related to teacher training, methodological resources and the assessment system. The results show that CLIL develops communicative and cognitive skills in students, helps to master subjects more deeply. At the end of the article, practical recommendations are provided for improving teacher training, improving textbooks and resources, and clarifying assessment criteria for the effective implementation of the method.

Keywords

CLIL, integrative education, content-based learning, integration of science and language, foreign language teaching, communicative competence, cognitive development, constructivism, competency-based approach, integrative methods, Uzbek education system, pedagogical innovation, teacher qualification, assessment system, learning motivation.

References

Bruton, A. (2011). CLIL: Some of the reasons why… and why not. System, 39(4), 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.09.009

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. John Benjamins Publishing.

Ikeda, M. (2013). CLIL in Asian schools: Issues and perspectives. Asian EFL Journal, 15(3), 45–62.

Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE — The European dimension: Actions, trends and foresight potential. European Commission Report.

Mehisto, P. (2008). Content and language integrated learning: A guide for teachers. European Centre for Modern Languages.

Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2012.658070

Yang, W. (2015). Implementing CLIL in EFL contexts: Challenges and solutions. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(2), 379–388.

European Commission. (2006). Recommendation on key competences for lifelong learning. Brussels: European Commission.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longmans, Green.

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Xalq ta’limi vazirligi. (2020). Umumta’lim maktablari uchun yangi o‘quv dasturlari va konsepsiyalar. Toshkent: Xalq ta’limi vazirligi.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

APPLICATION OF CLIL (CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING) METHOD IN UZBEKISTAN SCHOOLS. (2025). International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 5(12), 1186-1190. https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai/article/view/8820 (Original work published 2025)