Articles
| Open Access | DIGITAL JUSTICE IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: IMPLEMENTING AI FOR EVIDENCE HANDLING AND SUPPORT OF UNREPRESENTED DEFENDANTS IN UZBEKISTAN BASED ON SINGAPORE EXPERIENCE.
Soliyev Dilshod Baxtiyor ugli,Sabirova Sabrina Sabirovna , Senior Lecturer, Department of International Law and Public Law Disciplines, UWED,3rd-year student of the University of World Economy and Diplomacy International Law facultyAbstract
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into judicial systems has emerged as a defining feature of 21st century digital justice reform. Beyond mere digitalization of case files and remote access to hearings, modern justice systems increasingly deploy AI to support analytical tasks, evidence management, and improve procedural efficiency. Singapore’s Smart Courts initiative offers one of the most mature real-world examples of AI application in judiciary systems, incorporating advanced technologies into civil and tribunal processes while maintaining strict human oversight and ethical safeguards.
For Uzbekistan, the adoption of Presidential Decree No. UP‑140 (2025) “On Additional Measures to Improve the Level of Access to Justice through the Introduction of Artificial Intelligence Technologies into Court Activities and to Enhance the Material and Technical Support of the Judicial System” signals a strategic commitment to AI‑assisted adjudication and broader digital transformation of governance and justice. While current Uzbek regulatory frameworks remain at a formative stage, there is a compelling opportunity to leverage Singapore’s experience in shaping an AI‑enabled not only in the court system but also in criminal procedural process that enhances evidence handling, supports unrepresented litigants, and upholds due process. This article explores how AI tools can be responsibly incorporated into Uzbekistan’s criminal justice system for evidence gathering and assistance to unrepresented defendants, drawing on Singaporean practices and global principles of transparency, fairness, and judicial independence.
Keywords
artificial intelligence, smart courts, information technologies, evidence gathering, investigation, Singapore, law (right).
References
National Database of Legislative Data, Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, No. PF-140 dated 21.08.2025. https://lex.uz/pdfs/-7696567
National Database of Legislative Data, Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan on approval of the “Digital Uzbekistan–2030” Strategy, No. PF-6079 dated 05.10.2020
Uzbekistan to implement the Digital Court system... // The Tashkent Times. 22.08.2025. URL:
tashkenttimes.uz 07.11.2025). Tashkent Times
Sh. Allashova. Using artificial intelligence in legislation. (2025). World Bulletin of Management https://scholarexpress.ne/index.php/wbml/artide/viyew/5360.
Chief Justice S. Menon. Keynote Address at TechLaw.Fest 2025 // Supreme Court of Singapore. 10.09.2025. URL: judiciary.gov.sg (07.11.2025). Default
All Rise for the Honourable Robot Judge? |/ Al Singapore 2025. URL: aisingapore.org (07.11.2025).
Al Singapore, Supreme Court Practice Directions. Singapore, 2022. URL: judiciary.gov.sg (07.11.2025). Singapore Academy of Law
14. Remo, N. The Singapore Case (an overview of AI integration; the position of the Chief Justice on rejecting the use of AI in sentencing). SSRN, 25 June 2025. URL: ssmn.com (accessed 7 November 2025).
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.