This paper presents a detailed comparative analysis of Uzbek and English anthroponyms, focusing on their lexical and semantic properties. The study explores how linguistic, cultural, and historical factors shape personal naming traditions in both languages. By examining etymology, structure, motivation, and meaning, the article reveals how anthroponyms function as markers of identity, social values, and collective memory.

anthroponymy, etymological foundation, lexical system, naming trends, semantic transparency, lineage, semantically opaque, Alpomish and Gorogly, the Reformation period.

Jalilova Y. A semantic and cultural analysis of English and Uzbek names. Qo’qon DPI. 2025-yil 8-son. P-1441-1442.

Yuldashova, N. Linguocultural study of anthroponyms in irrelative languages (on the material of English and Uzbek epics). 2025.P-6-9.

Abdusamadov Z. and Nazarova S. (2025). The national-cultural analysis of phraseological units with anthroponomic components in English and Uzbek languages. 2025.P-12-17.

Jalilova Y. and Nazarova N. Historical development of uzbek and English anthroponyms. Education and research in the era of digital transformation. America-2024. Vol.1 No.2. 2025.

Yodgora Jalilova. ETYMOLOGY OF ENGLISH ANTHROPONYMS. Conference proceeding. JA Inkwell Publishing. 2025.

Alford. R. D. Naming and Identity: A Cross-Cultural Study of Personal Naming Practices. New Haven: HRAF Press. 1988.P-14-23.

Lobar Abdurahimova. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LITERATURE. Innovations in Language Teaching, Learning and Assessment. 2025.