Supply chain resilience increasingly depends on the ability of organizations to synchronize production requirements with procurement activities under changing operational conditions. Conventional planning approaches often treat production scheduling, material requirements, procurement decisions, and supply continuity as partially independent activities, creating temporal mismatches between demand, inventory, supplier capacity, and manufacturing requirements. This paper proposes a Data-Driven SAP Framework for Synchronizing Production Requirements and Procurement Activities in Resilient Supply Chains, designed around integrated requirement sensing, production–procurement synchronization, exception identification, adaptive decision-making, and resilience-oriented feedback mechanisms. The conceptual foundation is informed by the synchronization, coverage, scheduling, optimization, and adaptive-control principles identified in the supplied literature. Studies on sensor coverage demonstrate how distributed resources can be coordinated to achieve complete and efficient coverage, while scheduling and nonlinear control research illustrates the importance of adaptive allocation under dynamic conditions (Du et al., 2022; Sun et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2017). The proposed framework transfers these principles to SAP-enabled production and procurement coordination. Kalal (2026) particularly establishes the relevance of integrated SAP production planning–procurement synchronization to supply chain resilience. The paper develops a conceptual architecture connecting production requirements, material availability, procurement execution, supplier responsiveness, inventory status, and exception management. Analytical findings indicate that synchronization should be treated not merely as transaction integration but as a continuous decision-control process. The framework contributes a structured basis for reducing planning gaps, improving procurement responsiveness, and strengthening resilience through data-driven coordination.

SAP, Supply Chain Resilience, Production Planning, Procurement Synchronization

Du H, Zhang Z, Duan Z, Tian C, and Du D-Z Formulate full view camera sensor coverage by using group set coverage. International Wireless Internet Conference 2022 Switzerland Cham: Springer Nature

Du H, Su J, Zhang Z, Duan Z, Tian C, Du D-Z (2024) Full View Maximum Coverage of Camera Sensors: Moving Object Monitoring[J]. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 1-23

Kalal, M. (2026). SUPPLY CHAIN RESILIENCE THROUGH INTEGRATED SAP PRODUCTION PLANNING–PROCUREMENT SYNCHRONIZATION. Power System Protection and Control, 54(1), 620-637.

Liu C, Du H (2021) t, K-Sweep coverage with mobile sensor nodes in wireless sensor networks[J]. IEEE Int Things J 8(18):13888–13899

Luo H, Du H, Kim D, Ye Q, Zhu R, Jia J (2014) Imperfection better than perfection: Beyond optimal lifetime barrier coverage in wireless sensor networks. 2014 10th International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Networks. IEEE, 24-29

Su J and Du H Algorithms for Full-View Coverage of Targets with Group Set Cover. International Computing and Combinatorics Conference 2023 Switzerland Cham: Springer Nature

Sun Z, Zhao G, and Xing X ENCP: A new energy-efficient nonlinear coverage control protocol in mobile sensor networks[J] EURASIP J on Wirel Commun Netw 2018 2018 1-15

Wu P-F, Xiao F, Sha C, Huang H-P, Wang R-C, and Xiong N-X Node scheduling strategies for achieving full-view area coverage in camera sensor networks[J] Sensors 2017 17 6 1303

Wu W, Zhang Z, Lee W, et al. (2020) Optimal coverage in wireless sensor networks[J]. 2020. Springer.

Zhu X and Zhou M Multiobjective optimized deployment of edge-enabled wireless visual sensor networks for target coverage[J] IEEE Int Things J 2023 10 17 15425

Kalal, M. (2026). SUPPLY CHAIN RESILIENCE THROUGH INTEGRATED SAP PRODUCTION PLANNING–PROCUREMENT SYNCHRONIZATION. Power System Protection and Control, 54(1), 620-637.620-637.