Background: The integration of Generative AI (GenAI) in education is transforming creative and academic processes. While research has widely examined student perceptions of these tools, a knowledge gap persists regarding the specific dynamics of human-AI collaboration and its tangible effects on student skills. This study addresses this by focusing on how students experience and perceive working with AI as a creative partner rather than a mere tool.

Objective: This research aims to investigate students' experiences and perceptions of collaborating with GenAI on a digital content creation task. We specifically explore the impact of this collaboration on creative problem-solving and creative curiosity, the importance of prompt literacy, and the ethical concerns that arise from this new pedagogical approach.

Methods: We employed a mixed-methods, quasi-experimental design. A cohort of undergraduate students was divided into two groups: one collaborating with GenAI and the other using traditional digital tools for a content creation project. We collected quantitative data through pre- and post-intervention surveys measuring creative problem-solving and curiosity. Qualitative data was gathered via semi-structured interviews to gain a deeper understanding of student experiences and perceptions.

Results: Quantitative results revealed that students in the GenAI group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in creative problem-solving compared to the control group. Although both groups showed an increase in creative curiosity, the difference was not significant. Qualitative findings highlighted key themes, including students perceiving AI as a valuable brainstorming partner, the emergence of prompt literacy as a critical skill for successful collaboration, and a range of ethical concerns surrounding misuse and content ownership.

Conclusion: The study concludes that intentional human-AI collaboration can significantly enhance students' creative problem-solving abilities. The findings underscore the importance of developing new skills, such as prompt literacy, to navigate these tools effectively. For educational institutions, this research suggests the need to integrate frameworks that not only leverage AI's collaborative potential but also equip students with the ethical awareness and critical thinking skills necessary for the future of creative work.

Generative AI, human-AI collaboration, creative problem-solving

Alqasham, F. H. (2023). ChatGPT in the Saudi EFL classroom: A study of learner usage patterns and possibilities in learning optimization. Migration Letters, 20(7), 1251-1263.

Bajúzová, M., & Hrmo, R. (2024). Digital tools in education: The impact of digital tools in education on students' creativity. R&E-SOURCE, 1(s1), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.53349/resource.2024.is1.a1236

Batista, J., Mesquita, A., & Carnaz, G. (2024). Generative AI and higher education: Trends, challenges, and future directions from a systematic literature review. Information, 15(11), 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15110676

Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students' voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

Chan, C. K. Y., & Zhou, W. (2023). Deconstructing student perceptions of generative AI (GenAI) through an expectancy value theory (EVT)-based instrument. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.01186

Chandra, Y., & Shang, L. (2019). Qualitative research using R: A systematic approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3170-1_8

Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2024). Impact of AI assistance on student agency. Computers & Education, 210, 104967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104967

Field, A. (2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Firat, M. (2023). What ChatGPT means for universities: Perceptions of scholars and students. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.22

Gabora, L. (2020). Research on creativity. In E. G. Carayannis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 1974-1983). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15347-6_387

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.

Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons. Basic Books.

Greenier, V., Fathi, J., & Behzadpoor, S.-F. (2023). Teaching for creativity in an EFL context: The predictive roles of school climate, teaching enthusiasm, and metacognition. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50, Article 101419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101419

Hamid, H., Zulkifi, K., Naimat, F., Yaacob, N. L. C., & Ng, K. W. (2023). Exploratory study on student perception on the use of chat AI in process-driven problem-based learning. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 15(12), 1017-1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2023.10.001

Han, H. J. (2023). Learner perception for artificial intelligence technology based educational tools. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 24(10), 2363-2372. https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2023.24.10.2363

Hemment, D., Vidmar, M., Panas, D., Murray-Rust, D., Belle, V., & Aylett, R. (2023). Agency and legibility for artists through experiential AI. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02327

Hwang, Y., Lee, J. H., & Shin, D. (2023). What is prompt literacy? An exploratory study of language learners' development of new literacy skill using generative AI. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.05373

Jo, H. (2023). Decoding the ChatGPT mystery: A comprehensive exploration of factors driving AI language model adoption. Information Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669231202764

Kim, H.-K., & Han, S. (2021). College students' perceptions of AI-based writing learning tools: With a focus on Google Translate, Naver Papago, and Grammarly. Modern English Education, 22(4), 90-100. https://doi.org/10.18095/meeso.2021.22.4.90

Lee, D., & Palmer, E. (2025). Prompt engineering in higher education: A systematic review to help inform curricula. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00503-7

Lee, M., Yi, T. R. J., Der-Thanq, C., Song, H. J., & David, H. W. L. (2025). Exploring interactions between learners and ChatGPT from a learner agency perspective: A multiple case study on historical Inquiry. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 7167-7189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13114-y

Lee, Y., Byun, H., Kim, M., & Lee, S. (2017). A study of development and validation of the creativity index. The Journal of Creativity Education, 17(4), 1-18.

Liu, G., & Ma, C. (2024). Measuring EFL learners' use of ChatGPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance model. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2240316

Lo, C. K., Yu, P. L. H., Xu, S., Ng, D. T. K., & Jong, M.S.-Y. (2024). Exploring the application of ChatGPT in ESL/EFL education and related research issues: A systematic review of empirical studies. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00342-5

Mbiazi, D., Bhange, M., Babaei, M., Sheth, I., & Kenfack, P. J. (2023). Survey on AI ethics: A socio-technical perspective. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17228

Ngo, T. T. A. (2023). The perception by university students of the use of ChatGPT in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(17), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i17.39019

Sengar, S. S., Hasan, A. B., Kumar, S., & Carroll, F. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence: A systematic review and applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-20016-1

Singh, P., Phutela, N., Grover, P., Sinha, D., & Sinha, S. (2023). Student's perception of ChatGPT. In 2023 International Conference on Electrical, Communication and Computer Engineering (ICECCE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCE61019.2023.10442033

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wang, Y., & Zhang, W. (2023). Factors influencing the adoption of generative AI for art designing among Chinese Generation Z: A structural equation modeling approach. IEEE Access, 11, 143272-143284. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3342055

Wijnia, L., Noordzij, G., Arends, L. R., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Loyens, S. M. M. (2024). The effects of problem-based, project-based, and case-based learning on students' motivation: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09864-3

Wood, D., & Moss, S. H. (2024). Evaluating the impact of students' generative AI use in educational contexts. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 17(2), 152-167. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-06-2024-0151

Zha, S., Qiao, Y., Hu, Q., Li, Z., Gong, J., & Xu, Y. (2024). Designing child-centric AI learning environments: Insights from LLM-enhanced creative project-based learning. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.16153

Zhan, F., Yu, Y., Wu, R., Zhang, J., Lu, S., & Liu, L. (2023). Multimodal image synthesis and editing: The generative AI era. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(12), 15098-15119. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3305243

Zou, B., Liviero, S., Hao, M., & Wei, C. (2020). Artificial intelligence technology for EAP speaking skills: Student perceptions of opportunities and challenges. In M. R. Freiermuth & N. Zarrinabadi (Eds.), Technology and the psychology of second language learners and users (pp. 433-463). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34212-8_16