Articles | Open Access |

HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION IN INDIA: THE ROLE OF EMPLOYMENT STATUS EXAMINED THROUGH A DEPENDENCY APPROACH

Ronit Bisht , Research Scholar, School of Economics, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between employment status and household consumption patterns in India using the dependency approach. With a diverse economy and varying employment conditions across urban and rural regions, understanding the link between employment status and consumption behavior is crucial for policymakers. The research investigates how different employment statuses—such as salaried, self-employed, unemployed, and others—affect household spending patterns. By applying the dependency approach, which focuses on the interdependence of income sources and consumption behavior, the study provides a detailed analysis of how employment stability, income variability, and economic participation shape household consumption in India. The findings reveal that employed households tend to exhibit more stable and predictable consumption patterns, while unemployed households show significant fluctuations. The study also highlights the economic and social factors influencing consumption in different demographic groups, offering valuable insights for targeted economic policies and welfare programs.

Keywords

Household consumption, employment status, dependency approach

References

Bhandari, P., & Deaton, A. (2009). Does consumption inequality track income inequality in India? The American Economic Review, 99(2), 368-374.

Chatterjee, B., & Ravallion, M. (2017). Did the world's poor fare better or worse in the globalization era? World Bank Economic Review, 31(3), 518-528.

Datta, A., & Krishnan, P. (2014). Employment and inequality outcomes in India. World Development, 56, 1-12.

Himanshu, H. (2018). A review of India's rural employment guarantee program. World Development, 112, 282-292.

Maitra, P., & Ray, R. (2003). The effect of employment guarantee schemes on poverty and mobility in rural India: Evidence from West Bengal. Journal of Development Economics, 71(2), 423-443.

Rajan, R. G., & Subramanian, A. (2008). Aid and growth: What does the cross-country evidence really show? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(4), 643-665.

Ray, R. (2000). Inequality, poverty, and social welfare in India. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 923-968.

Sharma, A. (2016). Informality and household welfare in India. Journal of Development Studies, 52(5), 594-610.

Subramanian, A., & Deaton, A. (1996). The demand for food and calories. Journal of Political Economy, 104(1), 133-162.

World Bank. (2021). World Development Indicators 2021. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION IN INDIA: THE ROLE OF EMPLOYMENT STATUS EXAMINED THROUGH A DEPENDENCY APPROACH. (2025). International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 5(01), 5-8. https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijlcj/article/view/2617