This paper explores the intricate interplay between theoretical and normative frameworks in establishing the legitimacy of criminal law. Legitimacy in criminal law is a multifaceted concept that hinges on a delicate balance between societal norms, legal principles, and moral considerations. The study delves into various theoretical perspectives, including natural law, legal positivism, and social contract theory, to elucidate the foundational elements that contribute to the perception of criminal law as legitimate. Furthermore, it examines the normative principles that underpin the enforcement and acceptance of criminal statutes, such as justice, fairness, and the rule of law. Through a comprehensive analysis of these dimensions, the paper aims to provide a holistic understanding of how legitimacy is constructed, maintained, and challenged within the criminal justice system. By integrating theoretical insights with normative imperatives, this research offers a robust framework for evaluating the legitimacy of criminal law in contemporary society.

Legitimacy, Criminal Law, Theoretical Frameworks

Fallon Jr, R. H. (2004). Legitimacy and the Constitution. Harv. L. Rev. 118, 1787.

Ouziel, L. M. (2013). Legitimacy and Federal Criminal Enforcement Power. Yale LJ, 123, 2236.

Goodin, R. E., Pettit, P., & Pogge, T. W. (Eds.). (2012). A companion to contemporary political philosophy. John Wiley & Sons.

Applbaum, A. I. (2004). Legitimacy in a Bastard Kingdom.

Goldstone, R. J. (2000). The Kosovo Report: Conflict, International Response, Lessons Learned. Oxford University Press on Demand.

Griffo, M. (2016). The Aim and Meaning of Constitutions According to Thomas Paine. In New Directions in Thomas Paine Studies (pp. 195-206). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

Tanchev, E. (2000). Constitutional safeguards of legality and legitimacy. Openness and Transparency in Governance: Challenges and Opportunities.

Buchanan, A. (2010). The legitimacy of international law.

Hurd, I. (2008). After anarchy: legitimacy and power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton University Press.

Tyler, T. R. (2009). Legitimacy and criminal justice: The benefits of self-regulation. Ohio St. J. Crim. L., 7, 307.

Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. The journal of criminal law and criminology, 119-170.

University of Balt (2018). The United States Constitution. Dervied September 9, 2018, from https://home.ubalt.edu/shapiro/rights_course/C hapter3text.htm

Donini, M. (2001). A Criminal Law based on the constitutional charter: reasons and limits, the Italian experience.

Stuntz, W. J. (1997). The uneasy relationship between criminal procedure and criminal justice. Yale LJ, 107, 1.

Amado, G. & Antonio, G. (1996). The philosophy of law in Habermas and Luhmann, Bogotá, Editorial University Externado de Colombia, 1996.

Luhmann, N. (1997). Globalization or world society: how to conceive of modern society?. International review of sociology, 7(1), 67-79.

Lanthorn, H. & Chattopadhyat, S. (2014). Relevant Reasons’ in Decision-Making. The world Bank: India