Articles
| Open Access |
https://doi.org/10.55640/
POST-ERUPTIVE NON-CARIOUS DENTAL LESIONS: CLINICAL FEATURES AND DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
Bobojonova Muhlisa Tohir qizi,Allayarova Nafisa Ulugbekovna,Akantaeva Araylim Zeynadinovna,Ruziyeva Kamola Axtamovna , 2nd-year student of the Faculty of Dentistry, Samarkand State Medical University,2nd-year student of the Faculty of Dentistry, Samarkand State Medical University,2nd-year student of the Faculty of Dentistry, Samarkand State Medical University,Assistant of the Department of Therapeutic Dentistry, Samarkand State Medical University Samarkand,UzbekistanAbstract
Non-carious lesions developing after tooth eruption represent a common group of dental conditions frequently encountered in clinical practice; however, they are often underestimated or misinterpreted at early stages. These disorders are characterized by the loss of hard dental tissues not related to dental caries and are associated with the progressive destruction of enamel and dentin under the influence of mechanical, chemical, or biomechanical factors. The clinical significance of non-carious lesions lies in their tendency to cause increased tooth sensitivity, aesthetic defects, alterations in tooth morphology, dentin exposure, and subsequent secondary complications. Moreover, non-carious processes may clinically mimic dental caries, pulpitis, periodontitis, as well as enamel–dentin pathologies associated with endocrine or gastroenterological diseases, thereby complicating differential diagnosis. This article provides a clinical analysis of the most common post-eruptive non-carious lesions, including enamel erosion, abfraction, abrasion, attrition, wedge-shaped defects, hypoplasia, and pathological disturbances of enamel mineralization. For each condition, etiopathogenetic factors, clinical manifestations, diagnostic criteria, and distinguishing features from dental caries and other hard tissue defects are discussed. In addition, modern diagnostic approaches used in contemporary dentistry are reviewed, with emphasis on the diagnostic value of comprehensive history taking, clinical examination, and instrumental assessment methods (transillumination, radiological evaluation, and index-based analysis), as well as evidence-based individualized therapeutic strategies. The present article is intended to support dentists, residents in restorative dentistry, and practicing clinicians in improving differential diagnostic skills and developing early detection strategies in routine clinical practice.
Keywords
non-carious lesions, enamel erosion, abrasion, attrition, abfraction, wedge-shaped defect, dentin hypersensitivity, differential diagnosis, enamel–dentin damage, remineralization
References
Bartlett D, Dugmore C. Pathological or physiological erosion—Is there a relationship to age? Clin Oral Investig. 2008;12(Suppl 1):S27–S31.
Lussi A, Jaeggi T. Erosion—diagnosis and risk factors. Clin Oral Investig. 2008;12(Suppl 1):S5–S13.
Lussi A, Carvalho TS. Erosive tooth wear: a multifactorial condition of growing concern and increasing knowledge. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:1–15.
Bartlett DW. The role of erosion in tooth wear: aetiology, prevention and management. Int Dent J. 2005;55(4 Suppl 1):277–284.
Addy M, Shellis RP. Interaction between attrition, abrasion and erosion in tooth wear. Monogr Oral Sci. 2006;20:17–31.
Grippo JO, Simring M, Schreiner S. Attrition, abrasion, corrosion and abfraction revisited: a new perspective on tooth surface lesions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135(8):1109–1118.
Michael JA, Kaidonis JA, Townsend GC. Non-carious cervical lesions: a review of the literature. Aust Dent J. 2010;55(2):131–143.
Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Bush PJ, Cohen RE. Toothbrush abrasions and noncarious cervical lesions: evolving concepts. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2003;24(10): 785–793.
Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent. 1994;22(4):195–207.
Rees JS. A review of the biomechanics of abfraction. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2000;8(4):139–144.
Wood ID, Kassir AS, Brunton PA. Effect of bruxism on the dentition and the role of occlusal splints in management. Br Dent J. 2009;206(1):E1.
Manfredini D, Lobbezoo F. Role of psychosocial factors in the etiology of bruxism. J Orofac Pain. 2009;23(2):153–166.
Ganss C, Lussi A. Diagnosis of erosive tooth wear. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:22–31.
Schlueter N, Luka B. Erosive tooth wear—A review on global prevalence and on its prevalence in risk groups. Br Dent J. 2018;224(5):364–370.
Bader JD, McClure F, Scurria MS, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Case-control study of non-carious cervical lesions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1996;24(4):286–291.
Wiegand A, Attin T. Occlusal wear and erosion of teeth. J Dent. 2011;39(Suppl 2):S69–S75.
Smith BG, Knight JK. An index for measuring the wear of teeth. Br Dent J. 1984;156(12):435–438.
Eccles JD. Dental erosion of nonindustrial origin. A clinical survey and classification. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;42(6):649–653.
Shellis RP, Addy M. The interactions between attrition, abrasion and erosion in tooth wear. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:32–45.
Bartlett D, O’Toole S. Tooth wear and erosion: clinical features and management. Dent Update. 2015;42(5):438–444.
Magalhães AC, Wiegand A, Rios D, Honório HM, Buzalaf MAR. Insights into preventive measures for dental erosion. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(2):75–86.
Huysmans MC, Chew HP, Ellwood RP. Clinical studies of dental erosion and erosive wear. Caries Res. 2011;45(Suppl 1):60–68.
Carvalho TS, Colon P, Ganss C, et al. Consensus report of the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry: erosive tooth wear—diagnosis and management. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(7):1557–1561.
West NX, Seong J, Davies M. Management of dentine hypersensitivity: efficacy of professionally and self-administered agents. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(Suppl 16):S256–S302.
Heymann HO, Swift EJ, Ritter AV. Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 7th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2019. 928 p.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.