This article studies the role of ultrasound diagnostics (UTT) in optimizing the rehabilitation process in injuries of the internal structures of the knee joint. The study was conducted in a clinical-functional direction and was based on prospective observation and dynamic assessment methods. Patients were monitored stepwise (T0–T3) by ultrasound examination, and indicators such as synovitis, bursitis, hemarthrosis, meniscal changes, ligamentous stability, and muscle condition were assessed.

The results showed that individual adaptation of the rehabilitation program based on UTT led to clinical and functional improvement in 70–75% of patients, the diagnosis was clarified in 80–85% of cases, and treatment tactics were changed in 60% of patients in a timely manner. Dynamic ultrasound monitoring allowed for precise management of the rehabilitation process, early detection of complications, and reduction of recovery time.

The cost-effectiveness of ultrasound diagnostics has also been proven: a decrease in diagnostic costs, a reduction in treatment time, and a decrease in days of disability were observed. The results of the study confirm that the individual rehabilitation model based on ultrasound control is an effective and innovative approach to knee joint injuries.

knee joint, ultrasound diagnostics, rehabilitation, dynamic monitoring, synovitis, bursitis, hemarthrosis, meniscus injury, ligament injury, individual rehabilitation, functional recovery, UTT, musculoskeletal pathology.

Yuldashev Sh.R. Importance of ultrasound diagnostics in traumatology // Medical bulletin, 2020. – № 3. –Р. 45-49.

Turaev K.R. The role of ultrasound examination in clinical practice. — Bukhara, 2020. –98 p.

Khamraev B.N. Evaluation of joint pathologies using UTT // Clinical medicine, 2022. – № 4. –Р. 25-30.

Wasilczyk C. Ultrasound imaging in meniscal injuries: sensitivity and specificity analysis // Diagnostics, 2023. – Vol. 13, –№10. – P. 1785-1795.

Smith J, Patel R, Lee K, et al. The utility of knee ultrasound in detecting meniscal tears compared with MRI // American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2024. – Vol. 52, –№4. – P. 890-898.

Johnson T., Brown M. Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound versus MRI in meniscus and ligament injuries // Clinical Radiology, 2021. –Vol. 76, –№12. – P. 950-957.

Williams P., Anderson H. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of MRI and ultrasound in meniscal tear detection // European Journal of Radiology, 2025. –Vol. 172. – P. 110-118.

Miller T.T. Sonography of knee meniscal lesions // European Journal of Radiology, 2012. –Vol. 81. –№12. – P. 3734-3742.

Brown L., Davis K. Ultrasonographic assessment of meniscus damage in clinical practice // Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. –2024. –Vol. 43, –№5. – P. 1021-1030.

Thompson A., Green R. Validation of ultrasound for quantification of knee meniscal tissue // Skeletal Radiology, 2024. –Vol. 53. –№3. – P. 567-575.