Articles
| Open Access |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20178614
PATHOGENETIC MECHANISMS OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF BACTERIAL CONJUNCTIVITIS
Dilafruz Sh. Gulmurotova, Zahro A. Adhamjonova, Dilroz I. Abdumo‘minova , Assistant at the Department of Microbiology, virology and immunology of Tashkent State Medical University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan ,Student of Tashkent State Medical University, 2nd Faculty of General Medicine, Group 212A, Tashkent, Uzbekistan,Student of Tashkent State Medical University, 2nd Faculty of General Medicine, Group 216A, Tashkent, UzbekistanAbstract
Bacterial conjunctivitis occupies a significant place among infectious diseases of the anterior segment of the eye, and within its etiological spectrum, Staphylococcus aureus is recognized as a particularly relevant pathogen, especially in adults, elderly individuals, and patients with compromised ocular surface defense mechanisms. Contemporary literature indicates that the pathogenicity of this microorganism is not limited to superficial colonization but is mediated through a complex, multi-component virulence system. The adhesion of S. aureus to the conjunctival surface is facilitated by fibronectin-binding proteins, extracellular adherence protein, and clumping factors; subsequently, biofilm formation, tissue invasion, toxin secretion, and immune evasion mechanisms contribute to the persistence and recurrence of the disease. In particular, alpha-toxin, gamma-toxin, Panton–Valentine leukocidin, and enterotoxins enhance epithelial cell damage, promote the release of inflammatory mediators, and intensify local tissue destruction. Molecular studies have demonstrated a high prevalence of genes associated with adhesion, invasion, and immune evasion in ocular S. aureus strains; in certain clinical series, the hld and hlg genes were detected significantly more frequently in infectious strains compared to non-infectious isolates. Recent observations indicate that the proportion of staphylococci in bacterial conjunctivitis and the issue of methicillin-resistant strains remain persistent, thereby limiting the effectiveness of empirical therapy. Thus, the pathogenesis of S. aureus-associated bacterial conjunctivitis should be considered as an integrated system involving adhesion, biofilm formation, toxic injury, induction of inflammation, and antibiotic resistance.
Keywords
Bacterial conjunctivitis, Staphylococcus aureus, pathogenesis, virulence factors, adhesion, biofilm, alpha-toxin, gamma-toxin, Panton–Valentine leukocidin, enterotoxin B, antibiotic resistance, MRSA, conjunctival inflammation.
References
Afzal, M., et al. (2021). Susceptibility of ocular Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Antibiotics. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8533015/
Afzal, M., et al. (2022). Virulence genes of Staphylococcus aureus associated with ocular infections. Translational Vision Science & Technology. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9279920/
Archer, N. K., Mazaitis, M. J., Costerton, J. W., Leid, J. G., Powers, M. E., & Shirtliff, M. E. (2011). Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: Properties, regulation, and roles in human disease. Virulence, 2(5), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.4161/viru.2.5.17724
Astley, R., et al. (2019). An eye on Staphylococcus aureus toxins: Roles in ocular damage and inflammation. Toxins, 11(6), 356. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6628431/
Azari, A. A., & Barney, N. P. (2020). Conjunctivitis: A systematic review of diagnosis and treatment. JAMA, 323(10), 1052–1062. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7431717/
Becker, K., Heilmann, C., & Peters, G. (2014). Coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 27(4), 870–926. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00109-13
Berube, B. J., & Bubeck Wardenburg, J. (2013). Staphylococcus aureus α-toxin: Nearly a century of intrigue. Toxins, 5(6), 1140–1166. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins5061140
Boles, B. R., & Horswill, A. R. (2011). Staphylococcal biofilm disassembly. Trends in Microbiology, 19(9), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2011.06.004
Chambers, H. F., & DeLeo, F. R. (2009). Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 7(9), 629–641. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2200
Cheung, G. Y. C., Bae, J. S., & Otto, M. (2021). Pathogenicity and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. Virulence, 12(1), 547–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2021.1878688
DeLeo, F. R., Otto, M., Kreiswirth, B. N., & Chambers, H. F. (2010). Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet, 375(9725), 1557–1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61999-1
Durán-Manuel, E. M., et al. (2023). Molecular characterization of bacterial agents causing ocular infections. Pathogens, 12(11), 1294. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/12/11/1294
Fleiszig, S. M. J., & Evans, D. J. (2010). Pathogenesis of bacterial keratitis: Studies with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Clinical & Experimental Optometry, 93(4), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.2010.00488.x
Foster, T. J. (2005). Immune evasion by staphylococci. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 3(12), 948–958. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1289
Foster, T. J., Geoghegan, J. A., Ganesh, V. K., & Höök, M. (2014). Adhesion, invasion and evasion. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 12(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3161
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.