Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.55640/

FROM BIOINERTNESS TO BIOACTIVITY: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF MODERN APPROACHES IN MATERIAL SELECTION FOR FIXED DENTAL PROSTHESES

Ataxonov Azizbek Abdisalomovich , Assistant of the Department of orthopedic dentistry and orthodontics Andijan State Medical Institute, Andijan city

Abstract

 This analytical review provides an in-depth examination of the modern principles for selecting materials for fixed dental prostheses, with a primary focus on the significant paradigm shift from traditional bioinert materials to a new generation of bioactive and bio-integrative materials. The article presents a detailed comparative analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of major material classes, including metal alloys (addressing risks of ion release, cytotoxicity, and hypersensitivity), zirconia and advanced ceramics (highlighting high biocompatibility, excellent mechanical properties, and resistance to microbial adhesion), and polymer composites (discussing challenges like residual monomers and oxidative stress). The review concludes that the future of restorative dentistry lies in enhancing the biological integration of biomaterials through advanced surface modification techniques, plasma coatings, nano-structured composites, and bioactive surfaces. These innovations are crucial for improving long-term clinical outcomes, extending the functional lifespan of prostheses, and promoting the health of surrounding oral tissues.

Keywords

biointegration, dental biomaterials, surface modification, zirconia dioxide, cytotoxicity, bioactivity, fixed prosthodontics, biological interface, tissue engineering.

References

Boskey, A. L. (2020). Current concepts of biomineralization and bioactive materials. Journal of Dental Research, 99(6), 599-601.

Flemmig, T. F., & Beikler, T. (2014). Biocompatibility of polymer-based dental materials. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 27(5), 411-413.

Gao, Y., Li, Y., & Li, W. (2018). Plasma modification and fibroblast adhesion on titanium-based biomaterials. Surface and Interface Analysis, 50(5), 589-596.

Geis-Gerstorfer, J. (1994). Corrosion of dental alloys. Clinical Oral Investigations, 1(1), 1-2.

Hench, L. L. (1998). Biomaterials: a forecast for the future. Biomaterials, 19(16), 1419-1423.

Manicone, P. F., Rossi Iommetti, P., & Raffaelli, L. (2007). An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. Journal of Dentistry, 35(11), 819-826.

Matsushita, T., Hanawa, T., & Ota, M. (2020). Surface modification of titanium and its alloys by plasma treatment. Surface and Coatings Technology, 399, 126131.

Mitra, S. B., Wu, D., & Holmes, B. N. (2003). An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 134(10), 1382-1390.

Okazaki, Y., & Gotoh, E. (2003). Comparison of metal release from various metallic biomaterials in vitro. Biomaterials, 24(7), 1167-1172.

Peutzfeldt, A. (1997). Resin composites in dentistry: the monomer systems. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 105(2), 97-116.

Piconi, C., & Maccauro, G. (1999). Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials, 20(1), 1-25.

Rasulova, Sh., & Abdug‘afforov, A. (2022). Og‘iz to‘qimalarining biomateriallarga biologik javobi [Biological response of oral tissues to biomaterials]. Stomatologiya jurnali.

Schmalz, G., & Garhammer, P. (2002). Biological interactions of dental materials. Clinical Oral Investigations, 6(3), 121-127.

Wataha, J. C. (2000). Biocompatibility of dental alloys. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 83(2), 223-234.

Zhang, Y., & Lawn, B. R. (2019). Novel zirconia materials in dentistry. Journal of Dental Research, 98(2), 140-147.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

FROM BIOINERTNESS TO BIOACTIVITY: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF MODERN APPROACHES IN MATERIAL SELECTION FOR FIXED DENTAL PROSTHESES. (2025). International Journal of Medical Sciences, 5(10), 168-171. https://doi.org/10.55640/