Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.55640/

EFFECT OF PROSTHETIC MATERIALS AND STRUCTURAL DESIGNS ON CHEWING EFFICIENCY AND LIFE QUALITY: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW

Shokirov Khushnudbek Akbarjonovich , Assistant of the Department of orthopedic dentistry and orthodontics Andijan State Medical Institute, Andijan city

Abstract

This study analyzes the interrelation of biomechanical, aesthetic, and psychological factors in modern dental prosthetics. According to the literature review, the biomechanical stability of the prosthesis design, appropriate material selection, and its biocompatibility with oral tissues are crucial for restoring masticatory function. Aesthetically optimized prostheses improve patients’ psychological well-being, social activity, and overall quality of life. Psychological factors determine adaptation to the prosthesis and the long-term stability of treatment outcomes. The study emphasizes that the integration of CAD/CAM technologies, PEEK and composite materials, along with individualized design approaches, significantly enhances the effectiveness of dental rehabilitation.

Keywords

dental prosthetics, biomechanics, masticatory efficiency, quality of life, aesthetic factors, psychological adaptation, CAD/CAM technology, PEEK material.

References

Al Jabbari, Y. S. (2022). Advancements in CAD/CAM fabrication of dental prostheses. Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 14(4), 225-235.

Allen, P. F. (2020). Quality of life measures in prosthodontics: A review. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 33(1), 91-97.

Barão, V. A. R. (2021). Biomechanical principles in modern prosthodontics. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 125(3), 381-384.

Chen, Q. (2024). Integrative approach to biomechanical and psychological aspects of dental prosthetics. Frontiers in Oral Health, 5, 1-8.

Goiato, M. C., & Santos, D. M. (2020). Clinical and patient-based outcomes in esthetic prosthodontics. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 28, e20190439.

Heydecke, G. (2020). Esthetic evaluation in prosthodontic treatment outcomes. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 47(1), 78-85.

Ivanov, A. N., & Kuznetsova, L. P. (2021). Современные аспекты биомеханики зубных протезов [Modern aspects of the biomechanics of dental prostheses]. Stomatologiya (Moscow), 100(2), 115-120.

Miyazaki, T., & Shinya, A. (2021). Mechanical and biological properties of PEEK dental materials. Dental Materials Journal, 40(1), 1-10.

Ozen, J. (2021). Psychological and behavioral responses to removable dentures. Journal of Dental Psychology, 15(2), 45-52.

Petersen, P. E. (2021). Community Dental Health and Oral Epidemiology. Munksgaard.

Sato, H., & Nakamura, T. (2022). Psychological adaptation in implant-based rehabilitation. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 33(5), 450-459.

Vojdani, M., & Safari, M. (2021). Esthetic parameters in full and partial denture design. Journal of Prosthodontics, 30(S1), 3-12.

Wang, C. (2023). CAD/CAM technologies in contemporary restorative dentistry. Dental Materials, 39(1), 51-64.

Wismeijer, D. (2023). Functional load distribution in prosthetic dentistry. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 129(4), 583-586.

World Health Organization. (2022). Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030. WHO Press.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

EFFECT OF PROSTHETIC MATERIALS AND STRUCTURAL DESIGNS ON CHEWING EFFICIENCY AND LIFE QUALITY: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW. (2025). International Journal of Medical Sciences, 5(10), 179-182. https://doi.org/10.55640/