Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.55640/

COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STATE OF THE CERVIX DEPENDING ON THE METHOD OF CONTRACEPTION

Atakhodzhayeva F.A., Tashbaeva U.I. , Tashkent Medical Academy

Abstract

Cervical cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer among women and is currently the fourth most common cancer worldwide. According to WHO estimates, 604,000 new cases of cervical cancer and 342,000 deaths from it were registered in 2020[1]. Cervical cancer is most prevalent in low- and middle-income countries, which is associated with low levels of vaccination and screening of vulnerable groups of women. It is known that the main cause of cervical cancer is the human papillomavirus (HPV), especially its highly oncogenic strains (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, 52 and 58). The presence of these types of virus is mandatory, but is not sufficient for the development of the disease. Understanding the extent to which external factors contribute to the progression of oncogenic strains of the virus into cervical dysplasia and/or cervical cancer can help improve methods of preventing this disease.

Keywords

Cervical cancer, cervical dysplasia, cervical intraepithelial dysplasia, combined oral contraceptives, intrauterine device, contraception.

References

Cervical cancer. WHO. [WHO]

Cervical cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data for 16,573 women with cervical cancer and 35,509 women without cervical cancer from 24 epidemiological studies. Appleby P, Beral V, Berrington de González A, et al. Lancet. 2007;370(9599):1609–1621. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61684-5. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Combined estrogen-progestogen contraceptives and combined estrogen-progestogen menopausal therapy. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2007;91:1–528. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar].

Contemporary hormonal contraception and cervical cancer in women of reproductive age. Iversen L, Fielding S, et al. Int J Cancer. 2021. [PubMed] [CrossRef]

Functional association of oestrogen receptors with HPV infection in cervical carcinogenesis. Ramachandran B. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2017;24:R99–R108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Intrauterine device use and cervical cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cortessis V.K., Barrett M., Brown Wade N., Enebish T., Perrigo J.L., Tobin J. et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Intrauterine device use, cervical infection with human papillomavirus, and risk of cervical cancer: a pooled analysis of 26 epidemiological studies. Castellsague X., Diaz M., Vaccarella S., de Sanjose S., Munoz N., Herrero R. et al. Lancet Oncol. 2011 [PubMed] [Full Text] [Google Scholar]

Lifetime cancer risk and combined oral contraceptives: the Royal College of General Practitioners’ Oral Contraception Study. Iversen L, Sivasubramaniam S, Lee AJ, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(6):580.e1–580.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use. World Health Organization. Geneva: WHO; 2015. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Oral contraceptive use and risk of breast, cervical, colorectal, and endometrial cancers: a systematic review. Gierisch JM, Coeytaux RR, Urrutia RP, Havrilesky LJ, Moorman PG, Lowery WJ, et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013;22:1931–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Recent intrauterine device use and the risk of precancerous cervical lesions and cervical cancer. Averbach S., Silverberg M.J., Leyden W., Smith-McCune K., Raine-Bennett T., Sawaya G.F. Contraception. 2018 [Full Text] [Google Scholar]

Relative Risk of Cervical Neoplasms Among Copper and Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Users. Matthew E. Spotnitz, MD, MPH, Karthik Natarajan, PhD, Patrick B. Ryan, PhD, and Carolyn L. Westhoff, MD, MSc. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 [PubMed]

The effect of intrauterine devices on acquisition and clearance of human papillomavirus. Averbach S.H., Ma Y., Smith-McCune K., Shiboski S., Moscicki A.B. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 [PubMed] [Full Text] [Google Scholar]

The influence of hormonal factors on the risk of developing cervical cancer and pre-cancer: results from the EPIC cohort. Roura E., Travier N., Waterboer T., de Sanjose S., Bosch F.X., Pawlita M. et al. PLoSOne. 2016 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

The interaction between steroid hormones, human papillomavirus type 16, E6 oncogene expression, and cervical cancer. Moodley M, Sewart S, Herrington CS, Chetty R, Pegoraro R, Moodley J. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003;13:834–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2022). UN DESA/POP/2022/TR/NO. 3.[DESA publications]

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STATE OF THE CERVIX DEPENDING ON THE METHOD OF CONTRACEPTION. (2024). International Journal of Medical Sciences, 4(05), 317-321. https://doi.org/10.55640/