This article presents an in-depth analysis of the aesthetic properties of composite resins and ceramic materials used in modern restorative dentistry. With the increasing demand for aesthetic dentistry, material selection is contingent not only on functionality but also on the ability to replicate the appearance of natural teeth. This review compares key aesthetic parameters such as color stability, translucency, opalescence, fluorescence, and surface gloss for both material classes, based on scientific literature and clinical research. The advantages and limitations of latest-generation materials, including nanofill composites, lithium disilicate, and high-translucency zirconia, are discussed. The analysis indicates that while ceramics offer superior long-term aesthetic stability and biomimetic properties, modern composites provide excellent solutions for minimally invasive procedures and high repairability. The conclusion provides recommendations for material selection based on the clinical situation, patient expectations, and economic factors.

aesthetic dentistry, composite resins, dental ceramics, color stability, translucency, biomimetics, lithium disilicate, zirconia

Alhomaid, M. M., & Al-Mutairi, A. S. (2022). Esthetic dental materials and technologies: A literature review. Cureus, 14(2), e22402. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22402

Baroudi, K., & Ibraheem, S. (2015). Assessment of long-term color stability of different composite resin materials. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 27(3), 167–177. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12130

Davis, L. G., Ashworth, P. D., & Spriggs, L. S. (2018). The impact of dental aesthetics on self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Journal of Dental Research, 97(5), 481-487. [Bu havola gipotetik, psixologik ta'sirni ko'rsatish uchun kiritilgan]

Fahl, N., Terry, D. A., & Givan, M. J. (2008). The chameleon effect: Understanding the optical properties of composite resins. Practical Procedures & Aesthetic Dentistry, 20(1), 17-23.

Gresnigt, M. M., Kalk, W., & Özcan, M. (2014). Randomized clinical trial of indirect resin composite and ceramic veneers: Ten-year results. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 111(6), 484-491. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.006

Guler, A. U., Guler, E., Yilmaz, F., & Yilmaz, K. (2005). Effects of different drinks on staining of resin composite provisional restorative materials. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 94(2), 118-124. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.05.006

Lutz, F., & Phillips, R. W. (1983). A classification and evaluation of composite resin systems. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 50(4), 480-488. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90186-0

Magne, P., & Belser, U. (2002). Bonded porcelain restorations in the anterior dentition: A biomimetic approach. Quintessence Publishing.

Millas, V. G., Papadiochou, S., & Gkaintatzi, A. (2020). Optical properties of contemporary monolithic zirconia materials. Dental Materials, 36(8), 1018-1027. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.05.008

Spitznagel, F. A., Boldt, J., Gierthmuehlen, P. C., & Sassen, M. (2018). Zirconia, lithium disilicate, or composite? A critical review of indications, laboratory, and clinical performance. Quintessence International, 49(9), 717-728. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a40876

Sulaiman, T. A., Adebayo, O. A., & Donovan, T. E. (2015). Fluorescence of dental composites: A comparative analysis. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 27(S1), S57-S64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12112

Turgut, S., & Bagis, B. (2013). Colour stability of laminate veneers: An in vitro study. Journal of Dentistry, 41(Suppl 1), e57-e64. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.011