Articles
| Open Access |
https://doi.org/10.55640/
THE ROLE OF CONTACT ALLERGENS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF MICROVESICULAR ECZEMA
Zokirov Shokhrukhbek Qobiljon ugli , Department of Dermatovenereology, Andijan State Medical InstituteAbstract
Background: Microvesicular eczema (acute/subacute dermatitis) is a frequent dermatological condition characterized by pruritus, erythema, and vesicle formation. While often treated symptomatically, the underlying role of delayed-type hypersensitivity to contact allergens remains underdiagnosed in the Fergana Valley region. This study aims to identify the prevalence of contact sensitization in patients with microvesicular eczema and determine the spectrum of causative allergens. Methods: A prospective clinical study involving 150 patients with persistent microvesicular eczema was conducted. All participants underwent epicutaneous patch testing using the European Standard Series (ESS) of allergens. Reactions were read at 48, 72, and 96 hours according to ICDRG criteria. A control group of 50 healthy individuals was included for comparison. Results: Positive patch test reactions were observed in 68.0% of patients, significantly higher than in the control group (12.0%, p < 0.001). The most frequent allergens identified were Nickel sulfate (28.7%), Potassium dichromate (14.0%), and Cobalt chloride (11.3%). A strong correlation was found between "wet work" occupations and sensitization to preservatives. Conclusion: Contact allergens play a pivotal etiological role in the pathogenesis of microvesicular eczema. Routine patch testing is essential for identifying specific triggers, enabling targeted avoidance strategies, and preventing chronicity.
Keywords
Microvesicular eczema, allergic contact dermatitis, patch testing, nickel sensitization, skin barrier, occupational dermatology.
References
Thyssen, J. P., Linneberg, A., Menné, T., & Johansen, J. D. (2007). The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population—prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis, 57(5), 287-299.
McFadden, J. P., Puangpet, P., & Basketter, D. A. (2013). Why does allergic contact dermatitis look like it does? The role of the T cell. Contact Dermatitis, 68(1), 1-7.
Geier, J., Lessmann, H., Uter, W., & Schnuch, A. (2011). Occupational contact allergy to chromium in cement: a decreasing problem in Europe. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(11), 1329-1336.
Smith, V. M., & White, I. R. (2016). Allergic contact dermatitis to preservatives: the ongoing epidemic. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 41(4), 335-341.
Johansen, J. D., et al. (2015). European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing - recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis, 73(4), 195-221.
Fonacier, L., & Bernstein, D. I. (2019). Contact Dermatitis for the Practicing Allergist. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 7(1), 10-18.
Diepgen, T. L., & Coenraads, P. J. (1999). The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 72(8), 496-506.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.