Articles
| Open Access | A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FISHING TERMS IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH
Tangriqulova Karomat Saitovna , Teacher at Termez State University of Engineering and Agricultural TechnologiesAbstract
The rapid globalization of fisheries and aquaculture has necessitated a deeper understanding of specialized terminology across languages to facilitate international cooperation, accurate translation, and effective professional communication. This comparative study examines fishery-related terms (including fish species names, fishing equipment, methods, processes, and environmental concepts) in Uzbek and English. Drawing on lexical, semantic, structural, and cultural analyses, the research reveals that English terminology is highly standardized, abstract, and influenced by scientific internationalization, while Uzbek terminology blends native Turkic roots with Russian and English borrowings, reflecting traditional freshwater fishing practices in Central Asia. Key findings highlight direct equivalents for basic concepts (e.g., "fish" – baliq), but divergences in compound terms and regulatory vocabulary, such as "bycatch" or "sustainable fishing." The study identifies translation challenges and proposes strategies for terminological harmonization. It contributes to applied linguistics, lexicography, and the development of bilingual glossaries for Uzbekistan's growing aquaculture sector.
Keywords
Fishery terminology, Uzbek-English comparative linguistics, aquaculture vocabulary, fish species names, fishing methods and equipment, terminological standardization, cultural linguistics.
References
Tangirqulova, K.S. (2026). A Comparative Study of Fishery-Related Terminology in Uzbek and English. European International Journal of Pedagogics, Vol. 06 Issue 01, pp. 185-187. (All semantic groups and basic comparisons drawn from this source).
Cabré, M.T. (1999). Terminology: Theory, Methods and Applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 45-78. (Theoretical framework for terminology analysis).
Sager, J.C. (1990). A Practical Course in Terminology Processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 112-150. (Methods of comparative terminology).
Wüster, E. (1979). Introduction to the General Theory of Terminology. Vienna: Springer, pp. 20-35. (Concept of term systems).
Mairufov, Z.M. (1981). O‘zbek tilining izohli lug‘ati (Explanatory Dictionary of Uzbek). Moskva: Rus tili nashriyoti, Vol. 1, pp. 123-145 (for native terms like baliq, to‘r, ovlash).
Waterson, N. (1980). Uzbek-English Dictionary. Oxford University Press, pp. 67-89 (English-Uzbek equivalents for basic fishing vocabulary).
FAO. (2023). Fishery and Aquaculture Country Profiles: Uzbekistan. Rome: FAO, pp. 5-12 (species and methods data).
Sheraliev, B. et al. (2021). Molecular diversity of Uzbekistan’s fishes... Scientific Reports. (Fish species context, pp. 1-15).
Awde, N., Dirks, W., & Hikmatullaeva, U. (2002). Uzbek Dictionary & Phrasebook. Hippocrene Books, pp. 45-50 (practical terms like baliq ovlash).
Akobirova, S. & Mixailova, V. (1988). O‘zbekcha-ruscha lug‘at. Toshkent, pp. 210-225 (borrowings and equipment terms).
Khakimov, K.M. (1994). Uzbek-English, English-Uzbek Dictionary. Hippocrene Books, pp. 150-170 (modern aquaculture terms).
LearnEntry. (2024). Fish names in Uzbek and English. (Complete species list: catfish – laqqa baliq, salmon – go‘shti qizil baliq, etc.).
Uzbekistan Travel. (2024). Fishing in Uzbekistan. (Local species and methods, pp. 1-3).
Crystal, D. (2003). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 300-320 (etymology and structure).
Dirks, W. (2005). The Central Asian Heritage Group Uzbek-English Dictionary. (Additional compounds and phrases).
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.