This article analyzes speech perception based on the identification of onomastic units from a linguistic and cognitive perspective. The study emphasizes the role of anthroponyms in understanding speech content, as well as their communicative and pragmatic functions. It is argued that onomastic units serve as an important carrier of information in speech, helping the listener or reader quickly and accurately understand the text. The article also examines the concepts that arise during speech perception through onomastic units, as well as their national and cultural characteristics. The results of the study have significant implications for speech analysis, translation processes, and linguistic didactics.

anthroponym, tarzhima, cognitive mechanisms, identification, onomastic units, theoretical considerations, linguistic contribution, speech perception.

D. Gile. Initiation à l’interprétation consécutive à l’Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales à Paris. Meta 1982.- 3р.

-D. Gile.1984. Des difficultés de la transmission informationnelle en interprétation simultanée.

Babel 30 :1.

D. Gile. (à paraître). Les termes techniques en interprétation simultanée. Meta.

J.-P. Haton et J.-S. Liénard. 1979. M. Lederer. 1978. La traduction simultanée – fondements théoriques. Paris : Université Paris-Sorbonne.

M. Lederer. La pédagogie de la traduction simultanée. Dans J. Delille (réd.) L’enseignement de l’interprétation et de la traduction. Ottawa : Editions de l’Université d’Ottawa 1981. -52 р.

J.-F. Le Ny. Psychosemantics and simultaneous interpretation. Dans D. Gerver and W. Sinaiko. (eds). Language Interpretation and Communication. New York : NATO Conference Series. 1978.

R.K. Lochner.. Conference interpretation and the modern world. Babel 1976.-3р

B. Moser. Simultaneous interpretation: a hypothetical model and its practical application. Dans D. Gerver and W. Sinaiko. (eds). Language Interpretation and Communication. New York : NATO Conference Series. -1978.

R. Roothaer Language, thought and translation. Babel. -1978.3-4р.

D. Seleskovitch. Langages, langue et mémoire. Paris : Minard. -1975.

D. Seleskovitch. L’enseignement de l’interprétation. Dans J. Delille (réd.) L’enseignement de l’interprétation et de la traduction. Ottawa : Editions de l’Université d’Ottawa. -1981.

K.L. Smoke. An objective study of concept formation. Psych. Monogr. 1932.-191р.

T. Slama-Cazacu. Langage et contexte. La Haye : Mouton.1961.- 33р.