Articles
| Open Access | IMPROVING INFORMATION-ANALYTICAL MECHANISMS FOR EDUCATIONAL PROCESS MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EVIDENCE FROM A DUAL-PLATFORM WORKLOAD AND SCHEDULING SYSTEM
Umidjon Narziev , Bukhara state technical university. Bukhara. UzbekistanAbstract
This article examines how an operational dual-platform software system can be reinterpreted not merely as a timetable generator, but as an information-analytical mechanism for educational process management in higher education. The study uses a design-oriented qualitative case approach based on functional documentation, system descriptions, database-level materials, and interface reports for a software environment that integrates class scheduling, faculty workload distribution, classroom occupancy monitoring, reporting, and KPI-linked managerial views. The analysis identified a three-level management contour involving the academic affairs office, department heads, and university leadership. The system supports operational coordination, visual monitoring, comparative analytics, and evidence-based decision making through unified data flows and role-based access. At the same time, the study revealed important limitations: KPI values are imported from an external system rather than calculated natively, and attendance, assessment, and student progression modules are not fully integrated. The article proposes an improved information-analytical mechanism that links workload, schedule, room occupancy, reporting, and leadership analytics into a single managerial contour for higher education institutions.
Keywords
educational management; educational process management; information-analytical mechanism; digital monitoring; faculty workload; class scheduling; decision support; higher education.
References
Narziyev U. Z. (2026). “OTM dars jadvali uchun intellektual taqsimot algoritmi”. Development Of Science, 2(3), pp. 418-423.
Abdul-Hamid, H. (2014). What Matters Most for Education Management Information Systems: A Framework Paper. World Bank Group.
Functional report on the class scheduling and faculty workload system. (2026). Internal institutional report.
Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1), 64–71.
Márquez, L., Henríquez, V., Chevreux, H., Scheihing, E., & Guerra, J. (2024). Adoption of learning analytics in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(2), 439–459.
Pan, Z., Biegley, L., Taylor, A., & Zheng, H. (2024). A systematic review of learning analytics-incorporated instructional interventions on learning management systems. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(2), 1–21.
Technical analysis of the dual-platform academic workload and scheduling system and its transformation into dissertation materials. (2026). Internal institutional report.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.