Articles | Open Access |

IMPROVING INFORMATION-ANALYTICAL MECHANISMS FOR EDUCATIONAL PROCESS MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EVIDENCE FROM A DUAL-PLATFORM WORKLOAD AND SCHEDULING SYSTEM

Umidjon Narziev , Bukhara state technical university. Bukhara. Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article examines how an operational dual-platform software system can be reinterpreted not merely as a timetable generator, but as an information-analytical mechanism for educational process management in higher education. The study uses a design-oriented qualitative case approach based on functional documentation, system descriptions, database-level materials, and interface reports for a software environment that integrates class scheduling, faculty workload distribution, classroom occupancy monitoring, reporting, and KPI-linked managerial views. The analysis identified a three-level management contour involving the academic affairs office, department heads, and university leadership. The system supports operational coordination, visual monitoring, comparative analytics, and evidence-based decision making through unified data flows and role-based access. At the same time, the study revealed important limitations: KPI values are imported from an external system rather than calculated natively, and attendance, assessment, and student progression modules are not fully integrated. The article proposes an improved information-analytical mechanism that links workload, schedule, room occupancy, reporting, and leadership analytics into a single managerial contour for higher education institutions.

Keywords

educational management; educational process management; information-analytical mechanism; digital monitoring; faculty workload; class scheduling; decision support; higher education.

References

Narziyev U. Z. (2026). “OTM dars jadvali uchun intellektual taqsimot algoritmi”. Development Of Science, 2(3), pp. 418-423.

Abdul-Hamid, H. (2014). What Matters Most for Education Management Information Systems: A Framework Paper. World Bank Group.

Functional report on the class scheduling and faculty workload system. (2026). Internal institutional report.

Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1), 64–71.

Márquez, L., Henríquez, V., Chevreux, H., Scheihing, E., & Guerra, J. (2024). Adoption of learning analytics in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(2), 439–459.

Pan, Z., Biegley, L., Taylor, A., & Zheng, H. (2024). A systematic review of learning analytics-incorporated instructional interventions on learning management systems. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(2), 1–21.

Technical analysis of the dual-platform academic workload and scheduling system and its transformation into dissertation materials. (2026). Internal institutional report.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

IMPROVING INFORMATION-ANALYTICAL MECHANISMS FOR EDUCATIONAL PROCESS MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EVIDENCE FROM A DUAL-PLATFORM WORKLOAD AND SCHEDULING SYSTEM. (2026). International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 6(5), 67-72. https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai/article/view/13009