Articles
| Open Access | STUDIES ON ELLIPSIS IN SPOKEN VS. WRITTEN DISCOURSE.
Avazov Khamza Panjievich , Teacher of Karshi State UniversityAbstract
ellipsis — the principled omission of linguistically recoverable elements — has been extensively documented as a key cohesive mechanism in English discourse. Yet the ways in which its frequency, type, and function differ across spoken and written modes remain incompletely understood, particularly in relation to the interplay between register, communicative purpose, and grammatical licensing. This article presents a comparative corpus-based study of ellipsis across four registers: spontaneous spoken conversation, scripted broadcast speech, literary prose fiction, and published academic writing. Drawing on a 500,000-word annotated corpus, the study analyses the distribution of VP ellipsis, clausal ellipsis, nominal ellipsis, gapping, sluicing, and stripping across these modes, and investigates the discourse functions each type serves within its host register. The results reveal that ellipsis is substantially more frequent and structurally diverse in spoken registers, where it fulfils interactional and processing functions, while written registers deploy it selectively for stylistic economy and information focus. These findings carry significant implications for discourse theory, corpus linguistics, and the teaching of both spoken and written English.
Keywords
ellipsis, spoken discourse, written discourse, corpus linguistics, register variation, cohesion, VP ellipsis, clausal ellipsis, discourse analysis, applied linguistics
References
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson Education.
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide to spoken and written English grammar and usage. Cambridge University Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2018). Interactional linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
Hankamer, J., & Sag, I. (1976). Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 7(3), 391–426.
Leech, G., & Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd ed.). Pearson Longman.
Lobeck, A. (1995). Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. Oxford University Press.
Merchant, J. (2001). The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford University Press.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
van Craenenbroeck, J., & Merchant, J. (2013). Ellipsis phenomena. In M. den Dikken (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax (pp. 701–745). Cambridge University Press
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.