Articles | Open Access |

TYPOLOGY OF TEXTS IN MEDICAL DISCOURSE AND COGNITIVE-COMMUNICATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF TERMS

Mirjonov Nosir Numonovich , Independent researcher at Bukhara State University

Abstract

This article examines the formation and functioning of terms within medical discourse based on a cognitive-discursive approach. Drawing on the anthropocentric paradigm of modern linguistics, the study explores terminology in relation to human speech and cognitive activity. The article analyzes the mechanisms of terminologization of linguistic signs, as well as the processes of conceptualization and verbalization of notions. In particular, the unique dialogic nature of medical texts and the tools providing implicit communication between the author and the reader are discussed. The research highlights not only the nominative (naming) function of terms but also their cognitive-methodological function and their role in professional linguistic consciousness, specifically at the levels of "textemes" and "textual fragments." Furthermore, the article substantiates that medical discourse, unlike other scientific fields, possesses high modal saturation (with a statistical indicator of up to 13%). This indicates that terms serve as the primary framework in logical-argumentative connection and the verbalization of scientific conclusions.

Keywords

Medical terminology, discourse, cognitive linguistics, terminologization, metaphor, term, medical text.

References

Alekseeva, L. M. (2014). Профессиональный дискурс: терминологический аспект [Professional discourse: terminological aspect]. Вестник Пермского университета. Российская и зарубежная филология [Perm University Herald. Russian and Foreign Philology], (2), 5–12.

Arutyunova, N. D. (1988). Типы языковых значений: Оценка. Событие. Факт [Types of linguistic meanings: Evaluation. Event. Fact]. Nauka.

Beilinson, L. S. (2009). Профессиональный дискурс: признаки, функции, нормы (на материале коммуникации врача и пациента) [Professional discourse: signs, functions, norms (based on doctor-patient communication)] [Doctoral dissertation abstract]. Volgograd State University.

Chernyavskaya, V. E. (2010). Интерпретация научного текста: Учебное пособие [Interpretation of scientific text: A textbook]. LKI.

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.

Madumarova, S. (2021). Tibbiy matnlarda modallik va kirish so‘zlarning qo‘llanilishi xususida [On the use of modality and introductory words in medical texts]. Til va adabiyot ta’limi [Language and Literature Education], (4), 15–17.

Mirzoeva, V. M. (1996). Функционирование вводно-модальных средств межфразовой связи в научном (медицинском) тексте [Functioning of introductory-modal means of inter-sentential connection in scientific (medical) text] [Candidate dissertation]. Tver State University.

Mishlanova, S. L. (2002). Медицинский дискурс: теоретические основы и принципы анализа [Medical discourse: theoretical foundations and principles of analysis]. Perm State University.

Sloane, T. O. (Ed.). (2001). Encyclopedia of rhetoric. Oxford University Press.

Vasileva, V. V. (2005). Метатекст в научном дискурсе [Metatext in scientific discourse]. Стилистика и теория языковой коммуникации [Stylistics and Theory of Linguistic Communication], 45–56.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

TYPOLOGY OF TEXTS IN MEDICAL DISCOURSE AND COGNITIVE-COMMUNICATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF TERMS. (2026). International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 6(5), 778-781. https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai/article/view/13276