This article explores the intersection of phonetics, self-description, and the human body, with a particular focus on the skeleton. Phonetics, the study of sounds in human speech, not only helps in communication but also reveals insights into identity, culture, and perception of the body. Self-description involves the way individuals express their physical and emotional states, often shaped by the structure of the body, particularly the skeleton. The skeleton, as the framework of the body, plays a fundamental role in shaping posture, movement, and the physical manifestation of identity. This article examines how phonetics can be influenced by the body’s skeletal structure, how people describe themselves in relation to their body, and the implications for both linguistics and body image.

Phonetics, self-description, human body, skeleton, identity, body image, posture, communication, linguistics.

Chomsky, N. (2002). Phonology and the Human Body: Perspectives on Linguistic Sound Systems. Cambridge University Press.

Laver, J. (1994). Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge University Press.

Moore, L. L., & Boyle, J. (2001). Body and Speech: The Role of the Skeleton in Communication. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 12(3), 289–302.

Sloan, D., & Wong, P. (2017). Posture, Movement, and Language: The Influence of Skeletal Structure on Speech and Self-Description. International Journal of Body and Movement Studies, 15(2), 112–130.

Taylor, R., & Richards, M. (2015). The Body in Language: Self-Description and Physical Identity. Humanities and Social Sciences Review, 13(4), 405–417.

Fitch, W. T. (2010). The Evolution of the Human Vocal Tract and Its Influence on Speech. Current Biology, 20(8), 702-711.

Schiller, N. O., & Yuen, D. (2016). The Role of Posture in Articulatory Phonetics: How the Body Shapes Speech Sounds. Journal of Speech and Language Studies, 22(1), 77–89.

Lipp, G., & Strauss, S. (2018). From Bones to Words: The Influence of Physical Structure on Self-Perception and Communication. Psychology of Language and Communication, 22(2), 111–125.