
THE FUNCTION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION SECTOR IN THE COMMUNITY
Makhmudov Anvarjon Zokirovich,Khujayev Muminjon , Researcher European institute of Applied science and Management/Based on the review of Doctor of Phylosophical Sciences, Alfraganus UniversityAbstract
This quantitative research was conducted with the aspiration of expanding the theoretical and practical contribution to the field of satisfaction measurement. In the region of Central and Eastern Europe, there is a noticeable absence of student satisfaction surveys both nationally and at the level of individual universities. In comparison to Western universities in the Czech Republic, students are more interested in public universities, where studies are paid for by the state. However, the literature is mainly based on research on student satisfaction at private universities with paid education, while the measurement of satisfaction is usually timed after the educational experience. In all these areas, a certain degree of expansion of existing knowledge has been achieved.
Keywords
Quantitative, satisfaction measurement, public universities, educational experience.
References
Абдулла, Ф. (2006). Разработка HEdPERF: новый измерительный инструмент качества услуг для сектора высшего образования. Международный журнал исследований потребителей, 30 (6), 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00480.x
Закон № 111/1998 Coll. об университетах, Министерство образования и культуры Чешской Республики. (2022). Получено 14 декабря 2022 г. с сайта https://www.msmt.cz/vyzkum-a-vyvoj-2/zakon-c-111-1998-sb-o-vysokych-skolach
Афзал, Х., Али, И., Аслам Хан, М. и Хамид, К. (2010). Исследование мотивации студентов университета и ее связь с их академической успеваемостью (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2899435). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2899435
Бедггуд, Р. Э. и Донован, Дж. Д. (2012). Оценка успеваемости в университете: что мы на самом деле измеряем? Исследования в области высшего образования, 37 (7), 825–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.549221
Кеттелл, Р. Б. (1966). Тест осыпи для определения количества факторов. Многомерное поведенческое исследование, 1 (2), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
Cave, M. (1997). The Use of Performance Indicators in Higher Education: The Challenge of the Quality Movement. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Finn, A., & Kayande, U. (2004). Scale modification: Alternative approaches and their results. Journal of Retailing, 80 (1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2004.01.003
Fisher, M., & Marshall, A. (2009). Understanding descriptive statistics. Australian critical care: official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses, 22, 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2008.11.003
Williams, J., & Cappuccini-Ansfield, G. (2007). Соответствие цели? Национальные и институциональные подходы к распространению мнения студентов. Качество в высшем образовании, 13 (2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320701629186
Yan, X., & Su, X. (2009). Линейный регрессионный анализ: теория и вычисления. World Scientific.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.