This article examines the social factors influencing the adoption and use of non-standard vocabulary within linguistic communities. It explores how variables such as age, gender, socioeconomic status, and regional background contribute to the variation in language use, particularly in informal and digital communication contexts. The study delves into the concept of "covert prestige," where non-standard forms are employed to signal group identity and solidarity, often in opposition to standard language norms. Additionally, it discusses the role of linguistic insecurity, especially among lower middle-class speakers, who may overcorrect their speech to align with perceived prestige standards. The article also highlights how stylistic choices and the social context of interactions, including the race and dialect of interlocutors, influence the frequency and acceptance of non-standard vocabulary. Through a comprehensive analysis of sociolinguistic theories and empirical data, the article provides insights into the complex interplay between social identity and language variation.

social identity, language, standard, non-standard, variation, particular groups, sociolinguistic foundations, sociolinguistic factor.

Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Trudgill, P. (2000). Sociolinguistics: An Introduction to Language and Society (4th ed.). Penguin Books.

Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. Blackwell Publishers.

Holmes, J. (2013). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (4th ed.). Routledge.

Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1992). Social Network and Social Class: Toward an Integrated Sociolinguistic Model. Language in Society, 21(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500015041

Cheshire, J. (1982). Variation in an English Dialect: A Sociolinguistic Study. Cambridge University Press.

Coupland, N. (2007). Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge University Press.