Articles
| Open Access | THEORETICAL-METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF IDENTIFYING STUDENTS' TALENTS BASED ON THE PEDAGOGICAL VIEWS OF EASTERN THINKERS
Nazarov Sulaymon Mannonovich , T.N. Qori Niyoziy Uzbekistan Pedagogical Sciences Research InstituteAbstract
This comprehensive article delves into the theoretical and methodological foundations for identifying students' talents by synthesizing the pedagogical philosophies of prominent Eastern thinkers, including Al-Farabi, Ibn Sina (Avicenna), Confucius, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Khaldun, Rumi, Lao Tzu, and Mencius. Drawing from their insights on education, ethics, human potential, and societal harmony, the study constructs an integrated framework that emphasizes holistic development, moral cultivation, environmental influences, and intellectual inquiry as key elements in talent detection. Through an extensive literature review, comparative analysis of Eastern and Western approaches, and methodological synthesis, the research examines how these ancient perspectives address contemporary challenges in gifted education, such as cultural biases in assessment, under-identification in diverse populations, and the need for equitable, inclusive models. The analysis incorporates historical texts, modern interpretations, and cross-cultural comparisons to propose practical mechanisms like observational assessments, mentor-guided evaluations, community involvement, and ethical character profiling. Results highlight the enduring relevance of Eastern philosophies in fostering balanced talent identification, contrasting with Western cognitive-centric models by prioritizing relational, spiritual, and social dimensions. Key findings include enhanced methodological tools for educators, such as multi-faceted criteria that integrate innate abilities with nurtured virtues, and recommendations for policy integration in global education systems. This expanded exploration underscores the potential for culturally adaptive frameworks to promote innovation, equity, and sustainable human development in an increasingly interconnected world, addressing gaps in current practices and paving the way for interdisciplinary advancements in pedagogy.
Keywords
eastern thinkers, pedagogical views, talent identification, gifted education, Al-Farabi, Ibn Sina, Confucius, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Khaldun, Rumi, Lao Tzu, Mencius, holistic development, ethical cultivation, methodological frameworks, comparative education, cultural biases, moral education, intellectual harmony, environmental influences, cross-cultural analysis, equitable assessment
References
Al-Farabi's doctrine of education: Between philosophy and sociological theory. (n.d.). Muslim Heritage. https://muslimheritage.com/al-farabis-doctrine-of-education-between-philosophy-and-sociological-theory/
Bamberg, M. (n.d.). Education pushes aside Eastern philosophy. Medium. https://medium.com/educreation/education-pushes-aside-eastern-philosophy-8d788d5e8494
Bıçakcı, M. (2023). A comparison of cultural orientations in gifted and non-gifted adolescents. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mehmet-Bicakci/publication/369143554_A_Comparison_of_Cultural_Orientations_in_Gifted_and_Non-Gifted_Adolescents/links/640bc160315dfb4cce6f0ef9/A-Comparison-of-Cultural-Orientations-in-Gifted-and-Non-Gifted-Adolescents.pdf
Dallmayr, F. R. (2013). Being in the world: Dialogue and cosmopolis. University Press of Kentucky. https://www.scribd.com/document/522900464/Dallmayr-Fred-Reinhard-Being-in-the-World-Dialogue-and-Cosmopolis-University-Press-of-Kentucky-2013
Eastern and Western perspectives of giftedness: Is there any difference? (2015). Informit. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.063863434706861
Eastern vs Western education models: A great statistical analysis. (n.d.). Learning Mole. https://learningmole.com/eastern-vs-western-education-models/
Evolutionary improvements and dead ends. (n.d.). News for CONEU. https://newsforconeu.com/Pokol%2520-%2520Evolutionary%2520improvements.pdf
From Eastern philosophy to craft and innovative education. (2025). Histories, 8(4), 135. https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/8/4/135
Gifted education in Hong Kong and Israel: A comparative study. (2024). GATE2Gifted. https://www.gate2gifted.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/ARTICLE_Gifted-education-in-Hong-Kong-and-Israel-A-comparative-study.pdf
Ibn Sina on education. (n.d.). Muslim Heritage. https://muslimheritage.com/ibn-sina-on-education/
Lewin, D., & Ergas, O. (2018). Eastern philosophies of education: Buddhist, Hindu, Daoist and Islamic. Strathprints. https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/64684/1/Lewin_Ergas_2018_Eastern_philosophies_of_education_Buddhist_Hindu.pdf
Mathematical gifted education in East Asia and the West: A comparative review and case study Vietnam. (n.d.). Vietnam Journal of Education. http://vjes.edu.vn/mathematical-gifted-education-east-asia-and-west-comparative-review-and-case-study-vietnam
Nguyen, T. T. T. (2023). Mathematical gifted education in East Asia and the West. Vietnam Journal of Education, 18(1), 69–80. http://vjes.edu.vn/sites/default/files/vjes.vol18.is01.no09-69-80.pdf
Pokol, B. (2013). A discursive attempt in Islamic epistemology. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/37574052/Durham_E_Theses_Constructing_the_Architectonics_and_Formulating_the_Articulation_of_Islamic_Governance_A_Discursive_Attempt_in_Islamic_Epistemology
Renzulli, J. S. (1994). Talent identification and development in education (TIDE). Gifted Education International, 10(1), 3–7. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/026142949401000103
Sardar, Z. (n.d.). Breaking the monolith. Ziauddin Sardar. https://ziauddinsardar.com/sites/default/files/field/download/Breaking%2520the%2520Monolith.pdf
Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L.-F. (2017). Gifted education in China. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1364881. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1364881
Tan, L. S. (2010). Western and Eastern educational philosophies. Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia. https://pesa.org.au/images/papers/2010-papers/pesa-2010-paper-06.pdf
Tan, L. S. (2016). Educational philosophy as explored through the Eastern perspective. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/30399613/Educational_Philosophy_As_Explored_Through_The_Eastern_Perspective_doc
Tan, L. S., & Bıçakcı, M. (2015). Eastern and Western perspectives of giftedness: Is there any difference? ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287858312_Eastern_and_western_perspectives_of_giftedness_Is_there_any_difference
Values of Eastern and Western education. (2024, April 15). The Rising Nepal. https://risingnepaldaily.com/news/43817
Ward, T. B. (2023). A philosophical approach to talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 67(4). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02783193.2023.2285053
Western paths. (n.d.). Studfile. https://studfile.net/preview/1809581/page:7/
Winston, J. (2022). Giftedness and gifted education: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1073007. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2022.1073007/full
Winston, J. (2023). A comparative study of three different approaches to gifted education. University of Wollongong. https://ro.uow.edu.au/ndownloader/files/50575581/1
Yusuf, H. (2024). Eastern philosophy of education and educational policy: Features of application in the modern education system. The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 1429–1342. https://theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei/article/download/1429/1342/1426
Yusuf, H. (2024). Issues on the pedagogical thought and pedagogical practice of Muslim philosophers. Dialnet, 8932196. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/8932196.pdf
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.