Articles
| Open Access | NATIONALISM AND POLITICAL THEORY: A RELATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
Thuthuka Ledwaba , Department of Political Sciences, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, Pretoria, South AfricaAbstract
Nationalism has long been a pivotal force in shaping political landscapes, yet its interaction with political theory remains a nuanced and complex subject. This study, "Nationalism and Political Theory: A Relational Perspective," seeks to explore the dynamic relationship between nationalism and political theory by examining how nationalist ideologies influence, and are influenced by, theoretical frameworks in political thought.
Through a comprehensive analysis of historical and contemporary perspectives, this research identifies key intersections where nationalism intersects with political theory. It delves into the theoretical underpinnings of nationalism, exploring its role in shaping concepts such as state sovereignty, self-determination, and identity politics. By reviewing major political theories—liberalism, conservatism, socialism, and post-colonialism—this study elucidates how these theories address, incorporate, and challenge nationalist ideas.
The methodology includes a critical literature review, comparative analysis of theoretical texts, and examination of case studies illustrating the application of nationalism within political theory. This approach provides insights into how nationalism both influences and is shaped by political theories, revealing the reciprocal relationship between these two domains. The findings underscore that nationalism is not merely a peripheral issue but a central component that interacts with and often reshapes political theories. By mapping out these interactions, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of how nationalist movements and ideologies are interpreted through various theoretical lenses and how they impact the broader discourse of political theory.
Keywords
Nationalism, Political Theory, Theoretical Perspectives
References
Al-’Ulaymi, M. ai-D. (1968). AI-Uns al-falil fi Tarikh al-Quds toa’l-Kbalil. Najaf: al-Matbaa al-Haydariyya.
Ashrawi, H. (1994). This Side of Peace. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Devlin, J. F. (1992). Effects of leadership style on oil policy.
4. Fachrurozi, M. H. (2017). The Abdul Rivai’s thought of Nationalism in the Bintang Hindia Newspaper. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 4(6), 72.
Friedland, R. (2001). Religious Nationalism and the Problem of Collective Representation. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 125–152.
Gurr, T. D. (1993). Minorities at Risk: A Global View of Ethnopolitical Conflicts. Washington, D.C: Institute of Peace.
Hunt, C. and L. H. (1980). Sociology (Fifth Edit). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hutchinson, J. (1994). Nationalism (A. D. Smith, ed.). Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.
Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). The Culture of National Security Book by. Columbia University Pres,.
Kulap, M., Warto, M., & Joebagio, H. (2017). Nationalism of Nani Wartabone: Nation Character Building Foundation of Indonesia. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 4(3), 12.
Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies. Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-one Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Rich, N. (1985). Why the Crimean War? A Cautionary Tale. Hanover: University Press of New England.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2024 Thuthuka Ledwaba

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.