Articles | Open Access |

Reframing Consent, Law, and Harm: A Multidimensional Analysis of Marital Rape Across Legal, Psychological, and Socio-Cultural Contexts

Ananya Verma , Department of Social Sciences, University of Delhi, India

Abstract

Marital rape represents one of the most persistent yet under-acknowledged forms of gender-based violence, situated at the intersection of law, culture, sexuality, and power. Despite growing international recognition of sexual autonomy as a fundamental human right, sexual violence within marriage continues to be normalized, legally exempted, or socially minimized in many societies. This article undertakes an extensive theoretical and empirical examination of marital rape by synthesizing legal history, feminist theory, psychological research, and public health evidence, drawing strictly on existing scholarly literature. It explores how marriage has historically functioned as a site of sexual entitlement, obscuring consent and legitimizing coercion. The analysis traces the evolution of marital rape laws globally, with particular emphasis on India, where legal immunity remains contested and deeply entangled with cultural narratives of marriage, duty, and family honor. The article further examines the psychological and mental health consequences of marital rape, highlighting trauma, depression, post-traumatic stress, and the compounding effects of social silence. Perceptual studies on consent, sexual precedence, and victim resistance are discussed to reveal how societal beliefs shape responses to marital rape and influence legal outcomes. By integrating insights from criminology, mental health research, and socio-legal studies, this article argues that marital rape is not merely an individual crime but a structural phenomenon sustained by patriarchal norms and institutional inertia. The discussion critically engages with counter-arguments surrounding criminalization, including concerns about misuse of law, and situates them within broader debates on justice, accountability, and gender equality. Ultimately, the article calls for a paradigm shift that reconceptualizes marriage as a relationship grounded in continuous consent, dignity, and bodily autonomy, emphasizing the urgent need for legal reform, survivor-centered support systems, and transformative social change.

Keywords

Marital rape, consent, intimate partner violence

References

Agarwal, N., Abdalla, S. M., & Cohen, G. H. (2022). Marital rape and its impact on the mental health of women in India: A systematic review. PLOS Global Public Health, 2(6), e0000601.

Balemba, S., & Beauregard, E. (2019). What leads victims to resist? Factors that influence victim resistance in sexual assaults. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 9(3), 122–137.

Banerjee, D., & Rao, T. S. S. (2022). The dark shadow of marital rape: Need to change the narrative. Journal of Psychosexual Health, 4(1), 11–13.

Basile, K. C. (1999). Rape by acquiescence: The ways in which women “give in” to unwanted sex with their husbands. Violence Against Women, 5(9), 1036–1058.

Chandra, R., Srivastava, S., Singh, A., Mukherjee, S., & Patel, J. K. (2023). Locating perpetrators of violence against women in India. PLoS One, 18(8), e0289596.

Cody, L. F. (2022). Marriage is no protection for crime: Coverture, sex, and marital rape in eighteenth-century England. Journal of British Studies, 61(4), 809–834.

Deosthali, P.-B., Rege, S., & Arora, S. (2022). Women’s experiences of marital rape and sexual violence within marriage in India. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 29(2).

Dotania, S. K. (2022). Criminalising marital rape: Yet another weapon to harass husband. Indian Journal of Integrated Research in Law, 2(6), 1–9.

Ferro, C., Cermele, J., & Saltzman, A. (2008). Current perceptions of marital rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(6), 764–779.

Gallagher, K. E., & Parrott, D. J. (2010). Influence of heavy episodic drinking on aggression toward intimate partners. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 71(2), 299–306.

Garg, D. M., & Singla, D. N. (2013). Marital rape under Indian law. International Journal in Management and Social Science, 2(1), 59–68.

Hasday, J. E. (2000). Contest and consent: A legal history of marital rape. California Law Review, 88, 1373.

Jackson, A. L. (2015). State contexts and the criminalization of marital rape across the United States. Social Science Research, 51, 290–306.

Kilpatrick, D. G., Best, C. L., Saunders, B. E., & Veronen, L. J. (1988). Rape in marriage and in dating relationships. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 528, 335–344.

Kim, D. (2018). Marital rape immunity in India. Crime, Law and Social Change, 69(1), 91–107.

Martin, E. K., Taft, C. T., & Resick, P. A. (2007). A review of marital rape. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(3), 329–347.

Monson, C. M., Byrd, G. R., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1996). To have and to hold: Perceptions of marital rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11(3), 410–424.

Monson, C. M., Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., & Binderup, T. (2000). Does “no” really mean “no” after you say “yes”? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(11), 1156–1174.

Nair, V. S., & Banerjee, D. (2021). Crisis within the walls: Rise of intimate partner violence during the pandemic. Frontiers in Global Women’s Health, 2, 1–7.

Shotland, R. L., & Goodstein, L. (1992). Sexual precedence and perceived legitimacy of sexual refusal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(6), 756–764.

Yllö, K. E., & Torres, M. (2016). Marital rape: Consent, marriage, and social change in global context. Oxford University Press.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Reframing Consent, Law, and Harm: A Multidimensional Analysis of Marital Rape Across Legal, Psychological, and Socio-Cultural Contexts. (2026). International Journal of Social Sciences, 6(01), 1-5. https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijss/article/view/9592